\documentstyle[paasms4]{preprint} \input pub.sty \newcommand{\Myr}{M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$} \begin{document} \title{RADIO CONTINUUM MEASUREMENTS OF SOUTHERN\\ ~\\ EARLY-TYPE STARS.\\ ~\\ II. A DISTANCE LIMITED SAMPLE OF WOLF-RAYET STARS} \author{Claus Leitherer\\ \\ Space Telescope Science Institute,\thanks{Operated by AURA for NASA under contract NAS5-26555} 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218\\ \\ e-mail: leitherer@stsci.edu\\ \and Jessica M.\ Chapman\\ \\ Anglo-Australian Observatory, P.O.\ Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia\\ \\ and\\ \\ Australia Telescope National Facility, P.O.\ Box 76, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia\\ \\ e-mail: jmc@aaoepp.aao.gov.au\\ \and B\"arbel~Koribalski\\ \\ Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, P.O. Box 76, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia\\ \\ e-mail: bkoribal@atnf.csiro.au} \pub{ApJ} \recacc{30 October 1996}{22 December 1996} \maketitle \abstract A distance-limited sample of southern Wolf-Rayet stars within 3~kpc of the Sun has been observed with the Australia Telescope Compact Array at 8.64~GHz and 4.80~GHz. Radio continuum flux densities at one or both frequencies were obtained for 10 sources, and upper limits for 20; four sources are found to be thermal emitters on the basis of the observed spectral index. Five sources are classified as non-thermal. One source could not be classified. We derive mass-loss rates for the thermal sources. After combining them with all existing radio mass-loss rates of Wolf-Rayet stars in the northern and southern hemisphere, we perform a comparison with mass-loss rates derived from optical emission lines. The two methods lead to consistent results, suggesting that the assumption of a spherically symmetric, stationary, homogeneous stellar wind is either correct, or that deviations from this assumption affect both methods in the same way. Wolf-Rayet mass-loss rates are surprisingly uniform across spectral type. We find an average mass-loss rate of $4 \times 10^{-5}$~\Myr\ for all types observed, except for WC9 stars, which have rates that are lower by at least a factor of 2. An alternative explanation could be partial recombination of helium from He$^+$ to He$^{\circ}$ in the radio region, leading to a reduced number of free electrons, and therefore reduced radio flux for WC9 stars. Mass-loss rates of $8 \times 10^{-5}$~\Myr\ for late WN stars favored in recent stellar evolution models disagree with the observations of these subtypes. The results of this survey suggest that $\sim40$\% of all Wolf-Rayet stars with measured spectral index are non-thermal emitters at cm wavelengths. This percentage is nearly twice as high as that of non-thermal emitters among OB stars and is higher than previously estimated for WR stars. The nature of the non-thermal emission is still not fully understood. Possible causes of non-thermal emission are discussed. In particular, we speculate that non-thermal emission may arise from an interaction between a thermal WR wind and surrounding material due to a shell ejected during a previous evolutionary stage, or due to the wind of a companion star.