Space Telescope Science Institute
COS Instrument Handbook
help@stsci.edu
Table of Contents Previous Next Index Print


Cosmic Origins SpectrographInstrument Handbookfor Cycle 22 > Chapter 5: Spectroscopy with COS > 5.1 The Capabilities of COS

5.1
COS has two detectors and seven diffraction gratings (three for FUV, four for NUV), which enable high-sensitivity spectroscopy at low and moderate resolution across the FUV and NUV bands. The bandpass and resolution of each grating are presented in Table 5.1.
For each exposure the observer selects a detector (FUV or NUV), a grating, a central wavelength, an FP-POS setting, one of the two apertures (PSA or BOA), and a data-taking mode (TIME-TAG or ACCUM). Chapter 13 provides detailed specifications for each grating and aperture. Note that the two channels cannot be used simultaneously as the NUV channel is fed by the NCM1 mirror on the FUV optics select mechanism (OSM1).
Table 5.1: COS Grating Parameters
Bandpass per Exposure and FUV Gap1 ()
Inferred PSA
Resolving
Power
R = λ / FWHM2
Approximate BOA Resolving Power
Dispersion
(m pixel–1)
up to ~11,5003
76004 / 92005
44006
11007
3 35
3 35
3 41
1650 – 32008
1
Width of gap between FUV detector segments; see Section 5.5.
2
Empirically-determined FWHM of the LSF, which is not Gaussian. R increases approximately linearly with wavelength.
3
R falls with increasing wavelength. R ~ 8500 – 11,500 between 940 and 1080
4
Lifetime position 1.
5
Lifetime position 2.
6
Lifetime position 1.
7
Lifetime position 1.
8
Some shorter wavelengths are recorded in second-order light. They are listed in Table 5.4.

5.1.1 First-Order Sensitivity
COS is considerably more sensitive than STIS and earlier-generation HST instruments at comparable spectral resolutions, particularly in the far ultraviolet. Effective areas for targets observed through the PSA are shown in Figure 5.1, Figure 5.2, and Figure 5.3. Note that the COS sensitivity changes with time (Section 5.1.5), so the plots and tables in this handbook are based on predictions for the middle of Cycle 22 (April 2015). Please consult the COS website for updated information.
While the figures and tables in this handbook can be used to estimate of count rates and exposure times, we recommend the use of the COS ETC in all cases, because it properly computes instrument throughput, accounts for detector and astronomical backgrounds, and checks for violations of local and global count-rate limits.
Figure 5.1: Effective Areas for the FUV Channel through the PSA
Figure 5.2: Effective Areas for the NUV Channel through the PSA
Figure 5.3: Effective Area at Wavelengths below 1400
The effective areas of the various G130M central-wavelength settings are compared with those of G140L and STIS. Effective areas are not well characterized below 920 .
5.1.2 Sensitivity below 1150
Figure 5.3 compares the effective areas of the G130M and G140L gratings at the short-wavelength end of the COS bandpass. From this figure we can draw two fundamental conclusions. First, COS can obtain useful spectra at wavelengths between 900 and 1150 . Second, the contrast between the throughputs at 1070 and 1150 is roughly a factor of 100.
When G140L is used with CENWAVE=1280 wavelengths as long as 1200 can fall on Segment B. For many targets the count rate at 1150 will exceed the local bright limit, while the count rate at shorter wavelengths is perfectly safe. Consequently, turning Segment A off and using FP-POS=4 is the recommended approach for observing bright objects below 1150 with the G140L grating.
When grating G130M is used with CENWAVE=1055 Segment B records wavelengths shortward of ~1050 , depending on the FP-POS setting employed (Section 13.3). Using this grating mode with Segment A turned off further reduces the danger of high count rates at longer wavelengths. Special configurations to allow proper wavelength calibration must be used (see Section 5.7.4). Note that both the sensitivity and resolving power (Section 5.1.4) of G130M are greater than those of G140L in this wavelength range.
The Segment B sensitivity for the G140L/1280 setting changes by a factor of 100 between the wavelengths of 1070 and 1150 , so the flux vs. wavelength calibration is extremely sensitive to small misalignments in the wavelength scale. This is complicated by the absence of usable calibration lamp lines on Segment B for this setting (see Section 5.7.4). Therefore, even small wavelength misalignments will lead to sizable artifacts in the extracted flux for the calibrated spectra. The flux and wavelength calibrations for this setting are currently under revision and should be used with caution when interpreting the default pipeline products.
5.1.3 Second-Order Sensitivity
Because the MAMA detector is sensitive to wavelengths as short as 1150 , NUV spectra longward of 2300 are vulnerable to contamination from second-order light. To mitigate this problem the COS NUV optics were designed to provide peak reflectivities between 1600 and 2000 . Gratings G225M and G285M are coated with bare aluminum, which, when oxidized, has poor reflectivity below 1800 . After six reflections (two MgF2 mirrors in the HST OTA and four bare-Al optics in COS) light from below 1250 is attenuated by 99%. Mounted directly on gratings G230L and G285M are order-sorting filters that block most light from below 1700 .
For the G230L grating stripes B and C are still affected by second-order flux. When CENWAVE=3360 stripe B is contaminated by second-order light beyond 3200 . In a spectrum of the planetary nebula NGC 6833 obtained with CENWAVE=3360 second-order light accounts for roughly 40% of the flux at 3320 , and more that 50% at 3500 (Figure 5.4). Above 1700 stripe C is more sensitive to second-order light than first-order by design (Table 5.4), but on-orbit observations reveal that first-order light is detectable at a level of 5% from wavelengths greater than 3700 at all central-wavelength settings (COS ISR 2010-01).
In the FUV channel second-order light is present at long wavelengths (λ > 2150 ) in spectra taken with G140L CENWAVE=1280 FUVA. These photons are rejected by the COS pipeline during processing, but available in the “net counts” column of the *x1d*.fits files.
Figure 5.4: Second-Order Light in G230L Spectrum
The black curve is stripe B of the G230L CENWAVE=3360 spectrum of NGC 6833. The blue curve is an FOS spectrum over the same wavelength range (units are ). The red curve is an FOS spectrum of the 1600–1800 region, plotted as f(2λ). The FOS spectra have been rescaled by arbitrary amounts for display purposes. The dashed black curve, a combination of the two FOS spectra, reasonably reproduces the COS spectrum.
5.1.4 Spectroscopic Resolving Power
The spectroscopic resolving power (R = λ / FWHM) of each COS grating is listed in Table 5.1, and plotted as a function of wavelength for the FUV gratings in Figure 3.7 and Figure 5.5. These values correspond to the FWHM of the model line-spread functions (LSFs) that are described in Section 3.3. Preliminary measurements and model predictions of the resolving power for the new 1055, 1096, and 1222 central wavelength settings of the G130M grating are shown in Figure 5.5. Recent adjustments made during Cycle 20 to the focus for the 1055 and 1096 central wavelength settings of the G130M grating have increased their short wavelength resolution by a factor of several over that available before Cycle 20. The quantitative values quoted here for this improved resolution are based on ray-trace models and actual resolution may be slightly different. However, preliminary comparison with on-orbit test data appears consistent with the predictions of these models. A comparison of data obtained with these revised 1055 and 1096 settings with archival FUSE data for the same target is shown in Figure 5.6. Users should note, however, that for each of these modes the focus values have been set to optimize the resolution over a limited part of their wavelength range, and it will be necessary to use multiple settings to get the maximum resolution over the full FUV wavelength range (Figure 5.5).
The COS LSF is not a Gaussian, so simple rules relating R to the observability of narrow spectral features may not apply. Careful modeling of the LSF may be required to determine the feasibility of an observation. See Section 3.3, COS ISR 2009-01, and COS ISR 2013-07 for further information about the COS LSF.
Figure 5.5: Resolving Power of G130M/1055, G130M/1096, G130M/1222, G140L/1280, and G140L/1280.
The predicted spectral resolving power (R = λ / FWHM) as a function of wavelength for each segment of the COS FUV detector is shown for the G130M grating at the 1055, 1096, 1222, and 1291 central wavelength settings. The G140L grating is shown for comparison. These predictions are based on ray-trace models that include the MFWFEs of the HST primary and secondary mirrors.
Figure 5.6: Comparison of COS and FUSE Spectra.
The profiles of selected interstellar H2 lines in the spectrum of the O3.5V binary HD 93205 as seen in COS exposures (black lines) at the 1055 (left, association lc3n02010q, 1320 s) and 1096 (right, association lc3n03010q, 1000 s) central wavelength settings done using the newly optimized focus values are compared with the 4265 s FUSE observation E1590103 (red lines) of the same target. 
5.1.5 Time-Dependent Sensitivity Changes
Observations of HST primary spectrophotometric standard stars show that there is a significant time dependence of the COS sensitivity for some spectrographic modes. The reflectivity of the G225M and G285M NUV gratings, which are coated with bare aluminum (rather than MgF2 over aluminum like the other gratings), showed a time-dependent degradation before launch that has continued on orbit, decreasing at a rate of ~3% and ~10% per year respectively, independent of wavelength.
Throughout 2009 the FUV modes showed a wavelength-dependent sensitivity decline, falling ~3% per year below 1400 , and as much as 11% per year at 1800 . The decline slowed to ~5% per year in 2010 and to 3% in 2011, independent of wavelength. In the last quarter of 2011 the sensitivity decline increased again to as much as ~25% per year at 1300 , recovering to ~10% per year in the first quarter of 2012, and to ~5% per year up to mid-2013. As shown in Figure 5.7 these variations appear to be correlated with Solar activity, and they are consistent with a degradation of the quantum efficiency of the CsI photocathode of the FUV detector caused by reactions with residual atmospheric atomic oxygen. As Solar activity increases the Earth’s atmosphere becomes slightly inflated exposing the open-faced COS FUV XDL detector to increased levels of atomic oxygen. For details, see COS ISR 2011-02 and the COS website.
The COS data-reduction pipeline calcos includes a time-dependent sensitivity calibration, and regular monitoring of standard stars is used to update the sensitivity reference files. The ETC reflects the best estimate of the sensitivity for the middle of Cycle 22.
Figure 5.7: Relative throughput of the COS FUV over time
Relative throughput of the COS FUV settings as a function of time. The Solar activity, as measured by the 10.7 cm radio flux, is overplotted in blue (and a smoothed curve is shown in green). Dashed vertical lines (red) mark the breakpoints in the time-dependent sensitivity curve. These are the times when the slope of the sensitivity decline changed. The breakpoints appear to be correlated with changes in the intensity of the 10.7 cm radio flux..
5.1.6 Dip in Sensitivity around 1180
High S/N observations of standard stars have allowed us to uncover what is likely an optical effect that leads to a dip in the sensitivity at about 1180 . Figure 5.8 shows the spectrum of WD0320-539 observed in Program 12086 with the G130M/1291 and G130M/1327 settings. The sensitivity dip, of ~10% of the continuum value, is seen near 1180 in the G130M/1291 data and near 1190 in the G130M/1327 data. This effect is not currently corrected by calcos. The data shown in Figure 5.8 were taken at the original lifetime position, but this feature is also present in data taken at the second lifetime position. Preliminary analysis indicates that this feature is not fixed in pixel or wavelength space, but that it moves to longer wavelengths with increasing CENWAVE settings. More details about this feature will be posted on the COS website as they become available.
Figure 5.8: The 1180 Dip
The spectrum of WD0320-539 (from Program 12086) observed with the G130M/1291 (black) and G130M/1327 (red) settings. Dips of approximately 10% in sensitivity are seen at about 1281 and 1327 respectively.
5.1.7 Zero-Order Image
The 1105 central-wavelength setting of grating G140L places the zero-order image from the grating on Segment B of the FUV detector, violating detector count-rate limits, while a useful first-order spectrum falls onto Segment A. For this central wavelength observations can be made only in single-segment mode, with the high voltage for Segment B reduced (Section 5.6). After final alignment of COS on-orbit the zero-order image was also found to fall on Segment B for the 1230 setting with FP-POS=4. In Cycle 18, CENWAVE=1230 was replaced with CENWAVE=1280 to keep the zero-order image off the detector. Two-segment observations are allowed for all FP-POS settings with CENWAVE=1280.
5.1.8 Internal Scattered Light
The internal scattered-light level within COS is quite low. In ground-test measurements light scattered along the dispersion axis represents less than 1% of the nearby continuum. On orbit the COS LSF dominates the scattered light (Chapter 3). Scattering within the instrument is negligible (Kriss 2011).
5.1.9 Spatial Resolution and Field of View
The spatial resolution of COS is affected by the mid-frequency wavefront errors (MFWFEs) via the non-Gaussian wings they introduce (Section 3.3). The NUV channel corrects for the telescope’s spherical aberration, but not for the MFWFEs. For PSA observations the spatial resolution is ~ 0.07 arcsec for G185M and G230L, and 0.06 arcsec for G225M and G285M. For BOA observations, the spatial resolution is 0.29 arcsec for G185M, 0.22 arcsec for G225M, 0.24 arcsec for G285M, and 0.30 arcsec for G230L.
In the FUV the situation is more complex, because of the uncorrected astigmatism in the cross-dispersion direction. Figure 5.9 and Figure 5.10 show the strong dependence on wavelength of the FWHM of the cross-dispersion profiles for each of the FUV gratings at the first and second lifetime positions, respectively. The spatial resolutions at LP1 and LP2 differ by not more than 3 pixels (0.3 arcsec). At wavelengths for which the profile width is large the spectra of two objects separated by less than the profile width in the cross-dispersion (XD) direction would be combined.
The COS field of view is determined by the entrance apertures, which are 1.25 arcsec in radius, but the aberrated beam entering the aperture allows objects up to 2 arcsec from the center of the aperture to contribute to the recorded spectrum.
For additional information, please see “FUV Spectroscopic Performance” (COS ISR 2010-09, Ghavamian et al. 2010), “NUV Spectroscopic Performance” (COS ISR 2010-08, Bland et al. 2010), and “COS/FUV Spatial and Spectral Resolution at the New Lifetime Position” (COS ISR 2013-07, Roman-Duval et al. 2013).
Figure 5.9: Cross-Dispersion Profile Widths for FUV Gratings at Lifetime Position One
Variation in the width of the FUV spatial profile at the original lifetime position. The widths are obtained via Gaussian fits to the cross-dispersion profiles of a point source observed through the PSA. (Empirically-determined FWHM values may be slightly smaller.) Widths are plotted as a function of wavelength for each of the central-wavelength settings. Dips in the G130M and G140L spectra mark airglow features.
Figure 5.10: Cross-Dispersion Profile Widths for FUV Gratings at Lifetime Position Two.
Variation in the width of the FUV spatial profile at the second lifetime position. The widths are obtained via Gaussian fits to the cross-dispersion profiles of a point source observed through the PSA. (Empirically-determined FWHM values may be slightly smaller.) Widths are plotted as a function of wavelength for each of the central-wavelength settings. Top is G130M, middle is G160M, and bottom is G140L.
5.1.10 Photometric (Flux) Precision
Based on measurements made during and since SMOV, we estimate that the absolute flux calibration of COS is accurate to about 5% in the FUV, though uncertainties may be larger at wavelengths less than 1150 . The relative flux calibration is good to about 2%. In the NUV the calibration is accurate up to 3% for the medium-resolution gratings, and is slightly less accurate in some parts of the G230L bandpass. Time-dependent sensitivity corrections should be accurate to about 2% (Section 5.1.5).
5.1.11 Wavelength Accuracy
The COS medium-resolution gratings are required to achieve a wavelength accuracy of 15 km/s (resel 0.06 ). For G140L the requirement is 150 km/s. It is 175 km/s for G230L. Analysis of COS data obtained on orbit suggest that these requirements are routinely met. To do so, targets must be properly centered in the desired aperture. Target acquisitions are discussed in Chapter 8.
For modes where the wavelength shift determined from FUV Segment A is applied to Segment B (for example, if there are no lines present on FUVB) there is an addditional uncertainty of up to 10 pixels that must be applied. For the G140L grating this corresponds to a wavelength accuracy of 250 km/s. The wavelength solution for the BOA at blue wavelengths is not well characterized, so we recommend that the BOA not be used for wavelengths bluer than 1200 .
5.1.12 Vignetting of the NUV Channel
After on-orbit alignment of COS in HST, fluxes of external targets in the PSA were found to be depressed at the short wavelength ends of the NUV stripes. For the medium-resolution gratings the reduction is about 20% at the first pixel and rises linearly to expected levels over approximately the next 160 pixels (Figure ). For G230L the reduction is about 15% at the first pixel and extends about 110 pixels. (The slope is the same as in Figure 5.11; it is as though the ramp were shifted by 50 pixels.) The depression is thought to be due to vignetting of the beam at the NUV camera mirrors that image the spectrum on the detector. Corrections for this vignetting are not included in either the ETC or the calcos data-reduction pipeline. Users are advised to consult the COS webpages, where additional information will be posted as it becomes available.
Figure 5.11: Vignetting Profile for NUV M Gratings
Vignetting profile of the medium-resolution gratings as a function of pixel location showing the linear decrease in throughput near the low-pixel edge of the NUV detector. The red line shows the best fit to the profile obtained from observations of the white dwarf G191-B2B.

Cosmic Origins SpectrographInstrument Handbookfor Cycle 22 > Chapter 5: Spectroscopy with COS > 5.1 The Capabilities of COS

Table of Contents Previous Next Index Print