| Space Telescope Science Institute |
| FGS Instrument Handbook |
| help@stsci.edu |
Figure 2.3: The Koesters Prism: Constructive
and Destructive Interference.Figure 2.5: Improved S-Curves for Original FGSs
when Pupil is in PlaceFigure 2.9: Shows the changes in the FGS1r S-curves
resulting from the January 2009 AMA adjustment.Figure 3.2: Simulated PC Observations v. FGS
Observations of a 70mas BinaryFigure 3.3: Comparison of FGS1r and FGS3 Transfer
Mode PerformanceFigure 3.4: Relative Orbit of the Low-Mass Binary
stem Wolf 1062 ABFigure 4.1: Default FESTIME as a Function of V Magnitude
for F583W FGS1r: NEA as a Function of Magnitude
and FESTIMEFigure 4.5: Evolution of S-curve morphology along
the FGS1r Y-axisFigure 5.1: Overlay of the pointings used for the FGS3
OFAD calibrationFigure 5.3: FGS2 Guide Star Motion at the Onset
of a Day/Night TransitionFigure A.3: X,Y Position in Detector Space of FGS 3’s
IFOV During WalkDown to FineLock and Subsequent
Tracking of a Star in FineLockFigure B.2: FGS1r S-Curves: First Six Months After
AMA AdjustmentFigure B.3: FGS1r S-Curves: Second Six Months After
AMA AdjustmentFigure B.4: Optimized FGS1r S-Curves Used
in Angular Resolution TestFigure B.5: FGS1r Transfer Function: Change
in Angular Separation of a BinaryFigure B.6: FGS1r Transfer Function Amplitude
w/ Binary Separation