The following information may be of use to GOs submitting HST Phase II
proposals. All comments, unless otherwise indicated, refer to
Version 5.0 of the GHRS Instrument Handbook. These are
provided here for archival purposes.
- SPYBAL Spectrum Y-Balance:
A SPYBAL is executed to balance the light of the spectrum in the GHRS
"y"-direction (cross-dispersion) so that light does not fall off the
top or bottom of the diode array. A SPYBAL consists of a wavelength
calibration exposure. The wavelength used is different for each
grating and was chosen to give an even distribution of light over the
bandpass sampled.
In general, a new SPYBAL is inserted each time a different grating is
used. This means that as long as the grating does not change, no new
SPYBAL will be inserted, unless one has several exposures and the total
alignment time (not real orbital time) exceeds 90 minutes. If one has
several short exposures but does not change grating, a SPYBAL will be
inserted when one reaches the 90-minute mark, but only after the
completion of the executing exposure and before the next.
For science exposures (IMAGE, ACCUM,
WSCAN, OSCAN), any use of
Number_of_Iterations > 1 will be treated as a single
exposure (i.e., all iterations will have the same exposure_id).
For example, if you have a single exposure run 6 hours, a SPYBAL will
only be inserted at the beginning of the observation. The
90-minute rule does apply, but an exposure will not
be interrupted in order to insert a SPYBAL. However, we discourage
this latter type of setup since thermal drifts could
result in having the spectrum miss the diodes even though the object
itself is still well centered in the aperture. We do, of course, have
the new Optional Parameter SPYBAL which will allow the PI
to control the usage; however, we recommend the default usage of
SPYBAL except in unusual circumstances.
- Geocoronal Lyman-alpha through the SSA:
If an object is observed in Dark Time, the relative quietness of the
sky and the small size of the SSA mean that geocoronal Ly-a is coming through
at a rate of only 0.02 to 0.03 counts per second, most of which is falling
on one diode. This is only a factor of 2 or 3 above detector dark noise.
- Spectrum bandpasses and dispersions:
The GHRS Instrument Handbook provides typical values for these
quantities for the various gratings. However, in certain situations one needs
to know a precise value. We will include an algorithm in the next version
to allow you to do this, but for the present if you need precise information
on what wavelengths can be centered on or the bandpass achieved at a particular
wavelength, please contact us.
- Acquisition counts:
The GHRS Instrument Handbook now recommends that you achieve 1,000 to
10,000 counts in the peak pixel during an acquisition. Those values were
based on the old Point Spread Function. The high contrast of the post-COSTAR
PSF means that that condition can be relaxed. It is our opinion that
satisfactory acquisitions should be achieved with about 100 counts in the
peak pixel, that value allowing for some error as well when estimating.
This may be of particular value in acquiring faint objects if you are
confident of the UV flux (perhaps from an IUE observation) and so can make a
good prediction.
- Achieving high signal-to-noise on faintish objects:
A recurrent problem is applying FP-SPLIT to
not-so-bright objects to get the best possible S/N. The objects are
bright enough to get the needed overall S/N, but that needs to be
broken down into segments that are only 5 to 10 minutes long, and
within one of those there may not be enough counts to do a good
cross-correlation to register the spectra. The carrousel positioning
is, unfortunately, not reliable enough to do the registering without
the ability to do the cross-correlation.
There is no easy cure for this. One possibility is to specify discrete
grating positions at which to integrate instead of using
FP-SPLIT. One would then obtain a WAVECAL for each
position. If the separate exposures were pushed to 10 minutes each,
the fraction of time spent on WAVECALs is not too excessive.
- Overhead times in special cases:
The nominal overheads listed on the worksheets that come with the
Phase I Proposal Instructions are adequate in most cases, but
occasionally one may wish to obtain a large number of repeated
exposures on an object and to get them with better S/N than
RAPID mode allows.
For example, if Number_of_Iterations were specified for a
WSCAN, the full set of repeats would be done first at the
initial wavelength, then the carrousel would be moved and a second
series obtained at the second wavelength. In other words, the
wavelengths would not be cycled through repeatedly. In this
situation, the true overhead time per repeat is about 5 seconds. As a
concrete example:
Suppose we use STEP-PATT=5, which has a minimum cycle time of 27.2
seconds, and also specify Number_of_Iterations: 1000 exposures).
The total exposure time is then 1000 x 27.2 = 27,200 seconds. During
this operation the overhead would be 4 minutes plus 1000 x 5 seconds,
or 5,240 seconds. The overall duty cycle is then about 79% (84%
from these numbers less a 6% correction for the time spent looking
at background). Other STEP-PATTs could be used to get shorter
exposures, but with less on-target efficiency (high percentage of
overhead time).
- The memory problem:
As noted in the Instrument Handbook, observers can run into a problem
if their program specifies so many instructions that too much onboard
memory is used. The typical limit is about 40 separate ACCUMs
(each taking its own Exposure Logsheet Line) or, equivalently, 10
FP-SPLITs that each have four set points. A
WSCAN with 40 individual wavelength set points would also
cause a problem. However, the Number_of_Iterations does not
create a memory problem. In the above example, an ACCUM
with Number_of_Iterations: 999 would not cause a memory
problem.