New opportunities with HST in Cycle 16
HST will be offering two new types of GO program in Cycle
16: Coordinated HST-Spitzer Programs and Survey Programs. In
addition, the guidelines governing Snapshot proposals have been revised.
Coordinated HST-Spitzer Proposals
Users of both HST and Spitzer have had the opportunity to propose Joint HST-Spitzer observing
programs in each of the last three cycles (Cycles 13, 14 and 15). Those
proposals, however, are limited to less than 50 hours Spitzer time per proposal,
and less than 125 hours in total, for submissions to HST, and less than 90
orbits of HST time, for submissions to Spitzer. Similar restrictions apply to
Joint HST-Chandra and Spitzer-Chandra programs.
Many participants at the Great Observatories Workshop, held
in Pasadena in May 2006, expressed concern that the operational restrictions of
the joint programs hinders exploitation of the full scientific potential of
research programs utilising two or more Great Observatories. Those concerns are
heightened by the continued depletion of Spitzer's cryogens, which will limit
observations at wavelengths longer than 5 um to Cycles 4 and 5.
In order to address these concerns, HST and Spitzer and
offering the community the opportunity to apply for a new category of Joint
HST-Spitzer program. Coordinated HST-Spitzer programs will allow users to apply
for large-scale programs that require at least 50 hours of Spitzer time and at least 70 orbits of HST time. These proposals are
equivalent the Large GO proposals allocated by HST and the Large programs
allocated by Spitzer, and have the appropriate format and page limits.
Scientists interested in submitting a Coordinated
HST-Spitzer proposal must submit a non-binding Notice of Intent (NOI) by 1
December 2006. The NOI should include the name of the PI, the names of known
co-Is, the title of the proposal, a short (<200 word) abstract and an
estimate of the resources requested on HST and Spitzer. NOIs should be
submitted by e-mail to I. N. Reid (inr@stsci.edu)
and L. Storrie-Lombardi (lisa@ipac.caltech.edu)
Coordinated HST-Spitzer proposals should be submitted to
through the standard channels to both HST and Spitzer. The proposal deadline
is 26 January 2006, the HST deadline. The
proposals will be assessed by a Joint HST-Spitzer TAC, which will include TAC
members from both the STScI and Spitzer TACs. The NOIs will be used to identify
appropriate panel members. The Joint TAC will meet in mid-March 2007,
approximately one week before the HST TAC, and will have the option of
allocating the submitted programs up to 300 orbits of HST time
and 500 hours of Spitzer time.
GO Survey Proposals
Survey programs are designed to provide an opportunity for
PIs to undertake statistical projects, where the science goals can be achieved
through observations of a randomly selected subset of objects drawn from a
larger sample. To date, this type of scientific program has been undertaken
through Snapshot observations. Snapshot programs are still available (see
following section), but the typical completion rate has declined since Cycle
14. Survey programs have been added as an alternative means of pursuing this
type of project.
Survey programs are GO programs, and are therefore
adjudicated by the HST TAC/panels in competition with standard GO programs. A
successful Survey program is allocated the requested number of orbits, and has
the same guarantees for completion as standard GO proposals. Survey PIs,
however, can submit a superset of targets to provide maximum flexibility in
scheduling their observations.
Survey proposals have a number of special restrictions that
are designed to maximise scheduling opportunities (see the technical summary):
- Targets
should be distributed over a wide range of Right Ascension;
- Observations
must be completely unconstrained (no orients, timing constraints);
- Observations
must be limited to durations of less than 48 minutes per orbit, including
target acquisition and other overheads;
- If a
Survey program requires observations of N targets, PIs must submit a list
of M targets, where 1.5N < M < 3N.
- PIs
may not assign priorities to individual targets.
Survey proposals can also take advantage of the following
options:
- Multi-orbit
visits are permitted;
- Individual
visits can be tailored (duration, filter choice) to specific targets.
- Moving
target observations are permitted, provided that the observing windows for
each target are at least one month.
Full details on the characteristics of Survey programs are
given in Section 3.2.3 of the Call for Proposals for Cycle 16.
A technical User Information
Report (UIR) which discusses Survey Proposal scheduling characteristics is forthcoming.
Please check back in this article [or the Cycle 16 Announcement page]
for a link to this UIR soon.
As discussed in the technical summary, we expect that Survey
programs will lead to a significant increase in scheduling efficiency.
Consequently, we are offering an incentive to proposers. Each panel in the Time
Allocation Committee has a specific allotment of orbits to assign to proposals.
To encourage consideration of medium-size proposals, we subsidize the
allocations: thus, a 50-orbit program only uses 36 orbits from the panel
allocation, with the remaining 14 orbits drawn from a central pool. Survey
proposals will receive an additional subsidy of 15-20%.
Snapshot Proposals
As described in the SNAP User Information Report ( All About
Snaps, see http://www.stsci.edu/hst/HST_overview/documents/uir/UIR_SNAP.pdf
), the initial HST observing schedule is constructed from GO programs;
appropriate Snapshot observations are used to fill holes in that schedule.
Snapshot program completion rates of 30 to 70% were typical until recently;
however, those completion rates declined to 10-40% in Cycle 14, partly due to
increased scheduling efficiency and partly due to the reduced sky coverage
provided in two-gyro mode. The completion rates have increased to some extent
in Cycle 15, but still remain lower than previous cycles. It is for that reason
that we have introduced Survey Programs.
Survey programs are restricted to durations less than 48
minutes per orbit. In order to further distinguish Snapshot Programs from
Survey Programs, we are restricting individual Snapshots to durations less than
40 minutes (including target acquisition). This will provide more scope for
allocating Survey programs, and will also allow us to assign more orbits to GO
programs (with a corresponding decrease in the number of Snapshots allocated).
|
 |
|