Space Telescope Science Institute
Call for Proposals and HST Primer
help@stsci.edu
Table of Contents Previous Next Print


Hubble Space Telescope Call for Proposals for Cycle 22 > Chapter 6: Proposal Selection Procedures > 6.1 How STScI Conducts the Proposal Review

6.1 How STScI Conducts the Proposal Review
HST programs are selected through competitive peer review. A broad range of scientists from the international astronomical community evaluates and ranks all submitted proposals, using a well-defined set of criteria (see Section 6.2) and paying special attention to any potential conflicts of interest. The review panels and the Telescope Allocation Committee (TAC) offer their recommendations to the STScI Director. Based on these recommendations, the STScI Director makes the final allocation of observing time.
6.1.1 The Review Panels
The review panels will consider Small GO (1-34 orbits; Section 3.2.1), Medium GO (35-74 orbits; Section 3.2.2), Calibration GO (Section 3.2.4), Snapshot (Section 3.3), Regular AR (Section 3.4.1), Calibration AR (Section 3.4.3) and Theory (Section 3.4.4) Proposals. Each review panel has an allocation of a specific number of orbits, and the panel can recommend Small GO Proposals up to its orbit allocation. Medium GO Proposals will be ranked side-by-side with the Small Proposals, but the panels will not be charged for them; instead, the Medium Proposals above the scientific cutoff line in each panel (as defined by the Small Proposals) will proceed to the TAC, where they will be evaluated alongside highly ranked Medium Proposals from the other panels. The panel recommendations generally do not require further approval of the TAC (Section 6.1.2), and scientific balance will be determined within each panel rather than by the TAC. The panels do not adjudicate Large GO (Section 3.2.3), Treasury GO (Section 3.2.6), or AR Legacy Proposals (Section 3.4.2), but they will send comments on these proposals to the TAC for their consideration.
Panelists are chosen based on their expertise in one or more of the areas under review by the panel. Each panel spans several scientific categories (as defined in Section 8.8). In Cycle 22, we anticipate having two panels dealing with Planets (including the Solar System, exoplanets, planet formation, and debris disks); three panels dealing with Stars (of any temperature, in any evolutionary state, and including nearby star formation and Galactic ISM); two panels dealing with Stellar Populations (resolved); three panels dealing with Galaxies (including unresolved stellar populations and ISM in external galaxies); two panels dealing with AGN and IGM (including quasar absorption lines); and two panels dealing with Cosmology (including large-scale structure, gravitational lensing, and galaxy groups and clusters). Within a panel, proposals are assigned to individual expert reviewers based on the keywords given in the proposal (see Section 8.9). These keywords should therefore be chosen with care.
6.1.2 The Telescope Allocation Committee (TAC)
The TAC will include the TAC chair, the fourteen panel chairs, and three at-large members to ensure broad expertise across the full range of scientific categories. The primary responsibility of the TAC is to review Large GO (Section 3.2.3), Treasury GO (Section 3.2.6), and AR Legacy Proposals (Section 3.4.2), and any other particularly large requests of resources (GO Calibration, SNAP, Theory, or Pure Parallel Proposals). The TAC will also consider the panel recommendations concerning the Medium Proposals (35-74 orbits, see Section 3.2.2), will rank accepted Pure Parallel Proposals, and will be the arbiter of any extraordinary or cross-panel issues.

Hubble Space Telescope Call for Proposals for Cycle 22 > Chapter 6: Proposal Selection Procedures > 6.1 How STScI Conducts the Proposal Review

Table of Contents Previous Next Print