 |
HST/ACS UDF
|
 |
 |
Background on UDF Parallels Design and Scheduling:
NOTE: This concerns only NICMOS, WFPC2, and STIS observations in programs 9979, 9980, and 9981. ACS/HRC autoparallels were done as part of the primary ACS UDF program, 9978. An auxillary primary program, 10086, was used to fill some hard-to-schedule spots, however no parallels of any kind (not even ACS/HRC) were attached to it.
Unlike that which was done for previous community service deep field
campaigns, the UDF parallels, which consist of observations using NICMOS,
WFPC2, and STIS, were done in pure parallel mode. The observations were
performed in this manner for a couple of reasons. First, given the increased
size of the ACS UDF program, there was a desire not to complicate or make
anything more difficult in terms of the database loading and processing
of the primary ACS observations. Second, due to the very highly subscribed
period during which the UDF observations were to be performed, it was very
desirable from an overall scheduling point of view (i.e. considering other
programs besides the ACS UDF) to allow the ACS UDF observations to be
scheduled in more highly-SAA-impacted orbits as frequently as possible in
order to leave more of the SAA-free orbits available for other high priority
GO programs which needed them such as the NICMOS UDF and other programs
utilizing STIS MAMAs and some NICMOS observations. Had the observations been
coordinated parallels, this would have negatively impacted the overall HST
schedule in terms of using more of the precious SAA-free orbits. As may be
understood from these choices, we were willing to lose a certain fraction
of potential NICMOS parallels which required SAA-free or lesser-impacted
orbits in the cases where ACS primaries could be scheduled in more highly
SAA-impacted orbits.
In addition to the issues above, we have used the POMS pure parallel system
in some non-standard ways. The calendar builders have done extra manual work
to ensure that the ACS UDF primary program 9978 has only observations from
the three UDF pure parallel programs, 9979 (NICMOS), 9980 (WFPC2), and 9981
(STIS) attached. The calendar builders have also done extra manual work to
ensure that no parallels from these programs have been attached to other GO
primary observations which would otherwise take away the opportunities
of other GO pure parallel programs. Finally, the calendar builders have also
used the POMS system in such a way so as to ensure that the UDF parallels
are added in our priority order on a per instrument basis.
Since the POMS pure parallels system works on a priority basis, we designated
the NICMOS parallel program as our highest priority, followed by the WFPC2
parallels, and, at lowest priority, the STIS parallels. In practical terms,
this means that the NICMOS pure parallels are given a chance to schedule in
parallel with every ACS primary visit first, and then, on a subsequent pass,
the WFPC2 observations are given a chance to schedule, and finally, after
that, the STIS observations are given a chance to schedule with every ACS
visit. This proceeds in a cumulative manner, so that POMS is taking into
account the fact that parallels from another instrument may already have been
added. Within each of these per instrument passes, for any given ACS primary
visit, the priority-ranked list of visits is considered by POMS, and the first
(i.e. highest priority) one which POMS deems suitable is selected as the
candidate to be added to that ACS primary visit during the calendar building
process. If POMS determines that none of the choices are acceptable for
attachment to a given ACS primary visit, then no parallels for that instrument
are crafted for that primary visit. Similarly, if POMS deems that a particular
pure parallel template visit is acceptable and a parallel visit for that
instrument is crafted for attachment to the primary visit and then the parallel
visit does not actually fit when the actual flight calendar is being built,
then the parallel visit is dropped and no parallel observations for that
instrument are added to that primary visit in the actual flight calendar. In
previous tests, this "failure to add" rate for the latter case has been roughly
estimated at about 5% of visits.
With the NICMOS pure parallels being our highest priority, we wanted roughly
equal exposure time for our two filter choices, F110W and F160W. For WFPC2 and
STIS, the issue was less complicated since we only had images in F300W for
WFPC2, and slitless spectroscopy with 50CCD + G750L preceded by an image with
50CCD + MIRROR for each STIS visit. Consequently, pure parallel visit templates
in our programs were generally in priority order of the longest total exposure
times per visit, with additional attempts to have them be the result of the
longest exposures, in order to minimize read noise. For NICMOS, we had the
additional desire to try and keep a good balance between F110W and F160W. Our
highest priority NICMOS template observations for POMS to consider consisted
of a 2-orbit mix of F110W and F160W with the longest likely available exposure
times possible, and our shortest NICMOS template observations consisted of a
number of single-filter visits with similar exposure times and alternating
priorities. We created many more template visit options than has been usual
for most pure parallel programs due to our desire to be able to control and manipulate
priorities on a finer scale than is applied to most pure parallel programs.
Please see the Phase II listings themselves to see the detailed listing of
priorities and other details, but the basic scheme is outlined in the tables
below.
UDF Pure Parallels Design / Strategies
NOTE: Priority 99 = High, Priority 1 = Low
NICMOS - Highest priority UDF pure parallel program
| Orbits |
Exposures |
Bandpass |
Tot Texp |
Priority |
Template Visit # |
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1280s
2 x 1280s |
J
H |
2560 s
2560 s |
99
|
01
|
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1216s
2 x 1216s |
J
H |
2432 s
2432 s |
95
|
02
|
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1152s
2 x 1152s |
J
H |
2304 s
2304 s |
90
|
03
|
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1024s
2 x 1024s |
J
H |
2048 s
2048 s |
85
|
04
|
| 1-orbit |
1 x 1280s
1 x 1280s |
J
H |
1280 s
1280 s |
80
|
05
|
| 1-orbit |
1 x 1216s
1 x 1216s |
J
H |
1216 s
1216 s |
75
|
06
|
| 1-orbit |
1 x 1152s
1 x 1152s |
J
H |
1152 s
1152 s |
70
|
07
|
| 1-orbit |
1 x 1024s
1 x 1024s |
J
H |
1024 s
1024 s |
65
|
08
|
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1408s |
H |
1408 s |
60 |
09 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1280s |
H |
1280 s |
45 |
10 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1216s |
H |
1216 s |
40 |
11 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1152s |
H |
1152 s |
25 |
12 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1024s |
H |
1024 s |
20 |
13 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1048s |
J |
1048 s |
55 |
14 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1280s |
J |
1280 s |
50 |
15 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1216s |
J |
1216 s |
35 |
16 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1152s |
J |
1152 s |
30 |
17 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1024s |
J |
1024 s |
15 |
18 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 896s |
J |
896 s |
12 |
19 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 896s |
H |
896 s |
10 |
20 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 768s |
H |
768 s |
8 |
21 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 768s |
J |
768 s |
6 |
22 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 640s |
J |
640 s |
4 |
23 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 640s |
H |
640 s |
3 |
24 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 512s |
H |
512s |
2 |
25 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 512s |
J |
512s |
1 |
26 |
WFPC2 - Intermediate priority UDF pure parallel program
All F300w U-band imaging.
| Orbits |
Exposures |
Tot Texp |
Priority |
Template Visit # |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 900s |
3600 s |
99 |
01 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 800s |
3200 s |
95 |
02 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 700s |
2800 s |
90 |
03 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 600s |
2400 s |
88 |
04 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 500s |
2000 s |
87 |
05 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 900s |
1800 s |
85 |
06 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 800s |
1600 s |
80 |
07 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 700s |
1400 s |
75 |
08 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1200s |
1200 s |
73 |
09 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1100s |
1100 s |
72 |
10 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1000s |
1000 s |
70 |
12 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 600s |
1200 s |
68 |
13 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 500s |
1000 s |
65 |
14 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 900s |
900 s |
60 |
15 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 800s |
800 s |
55 |
16 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 700s |
700 s |
50 |
17 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 600s |
600 s |
45 |
18 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 500s |
500 s |
40 |
19 |
STIS - Lowest priority UDF pure parallel program
All 50CCD + G750L (slitless spectroscopy) with 1 short (100s)
50CCD MIRROR image at the beginning of each visit. Despite
diagnostics which call for them, CCD fringe flats are NOT
needed, even though the central wavelength is > 7000 Angstroms.
| Orbits |
Exposures |
Tot Texp |
Priority |
Template Visit # |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 1200s |
4800 s |
99 |
01 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 1150s |
4600 s |
95 |
02 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 1100s |
4400 s |
90 |
03 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 1000s |
4000 s |
85 |
04 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 900s |
3600 s |
80 |
05 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 800s |
3200 s |
75 |
06 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 700s |
2800 s |
70 |
07 |
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1200s |
2400 s |
65 |
08 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 600s |
2400 s |
60 |
09 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 1200s |
2400 s |
55 |
10 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 1150s |
2300 s |
50 |
11 |
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1150s |
2300 s |
45 |
12 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 1100s |
2200 s |
40 |
13 |
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1100s |
2200 s |
35 |
14 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 1000s |
2000 s |
30 |
15 |
| 2-orbit |
2 x 1000s |
2000 s |
25 |
16 |
| 2-orbit |
4 x 500s |
2000 s |
20 |
17 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 900s |
1800 s |
19 |
18 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 800s |
1600 s |
18 |
19 |
| 1-orbit |
2 x 700s |
1400 s |
17 |
20 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1200s |
1200 s |
16 |
21 |
| 0.5-orbit |
2 x 600s |
1200 s |
15 |
22 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1150s |
1150 s |
14 |
23 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1100s |
1100 s |
13 |
24 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 1000s |
1000 s |
12 |
25 |
| 0.5-orbit |
2 x 500s |
1000 s |
11 |
26 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 900s |
900 s |
10 |
27 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 800s |
800 s |
9 |
28 |
| 0.5-orbit |
1 x 700s |
700 s |
8 |
29 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 600s |
600 s |
7 |
30 |
| 0.25-orbit |
1 x 500s |
500 s |
6 |
31 |
|
 |
 |