|WFC3 Instrument Handbook for Cycle 25|
7.10.1 Dithering StrategiesFor imaging programs, STScI generally recommends that observers employ dithering patterns. Dithering refers to the procedure of moving the telescope by small angle offsets between individual exposures on a target. The resulting images are subsequently combined in the pipeline or by the observer using software such as AstroDrizzle. (See the DrizzlePac documentation.)Dithering is used to improve image quality and resolution. By combining multiple images of a target at slightly different positions on the detector, one can compensate for detector artifacts (blemishes, dead pixels, hot pixels, transient bad pixels, and plate-scale irregularities) that may not be completely corrected by application of the calibration reference files. Combining images, whether dithered or not, can also remove any residual cosmic ray flux that has not been well removed by the up-the-ramp fitting procedure used to produce flt images (see Section 7.7.2 and Appendix E:). Effective resolution can be improved by combining images made with sub-pixel offsets designed to better sample the PSF. This is especially important for WFC3/IR, because the PSF is undersampled by about a factor of 2 (see Table 7.5).Larger offsets are used to mosaic a region of sky larger than the detector field of view. (Large offsets can also be used for “chopping” to sample the thermal background. This has been recommended for NICMOS exposures at wavelengths longer than 1.7 microns, where the telescope thermal background becomes increasingly dominant, but the thermal background is not a problem for WFC3/IR). In WFC3, all offsets must be accomplished by moving the telescope (whereas in NICMOS it was also possible to move the Field Offset Mirror). Dithers must be contained within a diameter ~130 arcsec or less (depending on the availability of guide stars in the region) to use the same guide stars for all exposures. The rms pointing repeatability is significantly less accurate if different guide stars are used for some exposures. (See Appendix B of the DrizzlePac Handbook.). Mosaic steps and small dither steps are often combined to increase the sky coverage while also increasing resolution and removing artifacts. (See Section 6.12.1 for a discussion of the effect of geometric distortion on PSF sampling for mosaic steps).The set of Pattern Parameters in the observing proposal provides a convenient means for specifying the desired pattern of offsets. The pre-defined mosaic and dither patterns that have been implemented in APT to meet many of the needs outlined above are described in detail in the Phase II Proposal Instructions. The WFC3 patterns in effect in APT at the time of publication of this Handbook are summarized in Appendix C:. Observers can define their own patters to tailor them to the amount of allocated observing time and the desired science goals of the program. Alternatively, they can use POS TARGs to implement dither steps (Section 7.4.3). Observers should note that thermally driven drift of the image on the detector, occasionally larger than 0.15 pixels in two orbits, will limit the accuracy of execution of dither patterns. (WFC3 ISR 2009-32) Additional information on dither strategies can be found in WFC3 ISR 2010-09, which provides a decision tree for selecting patterns and combining them with subpatterns. WFC3 ISR 2016-14 provides compact patterns with up to 9 steps with the intent of preserving subpixel sampling as much as possible over the face of the detector, given the scale changes introduced by geometric distortion.7.10.2 Parallel ObservationsParallel observations, i.e., the simultaneous use of WFC3 with one or more other HST instruments, are the same for the IR channel as for the UVIS channel, previously described in Section 18.104.22.168.10.3 Exposure StrategiesGiven the variety of requirements of the scientific programs that are being executed with WFC3/IR, it is impossible to establish a single optimum observing strategy. In this section we therefore provide a few examples after guiding the reader through the main constraints that should be taken into account when designing an observation:
• These constraints put contradictory requirements on the ideal observing strategy. It is clear that, given a certain amount of total observing time, the requirement of long integrations for background limited performance is incompatible with a large number of dithering positions. Also, to split ramps for readout noise suppression decreases the observing efficiency, with a negative impact on the signal to noise ratio. Because the background seen by each pixel depends on the filter (Section 7.9.5), the optimal compromise must be determined on a case-by-case basis.In this regard, it is useful to consider Table 7.11, which summarizes the total background seen by a pixel, including sky, telescope, and nominal dark current, and the time needed to reach 400 e–/pixel of accumulated signal, corresponding to 20 e–/pixel of Poisson-distributed background noise. This last value, higher than the expected readout noise of ~12 electrons after 16 reads, is used here to set the threshold for background-limited performance. The passage from readout-limited performance to background-limited performance can be regarded as the optimal exposure time for that given filter, in the sense that it allows for the largest number of dithered images without significant loss of S/N ratio (for a given total exposure time, i.e., neglecting overheads). For faint sources, the optimal integration time strongly depends on the background (zodiacal, Earth-shine thermal, and dark current) in each filter, ranging from just 220 s for the F110W filter to 2700 s for some of the narrow-band filters.The optimal integration time needed to reach background-limited performance (see Table 7.11) can be compared with the integration times of the sampling sequences from Table 7.8. Table 7.12 synthesizes the results, showing for each filter which ramp (SPARS, STEP) most closely matches the optimal integration times for NSAMP=15.Table 7.11: Background (e–/pix/s) levels at the WFC3/IR detector. The columns show, from left to right: a) filter name; b) thermal background from the telescope and instrument; c) zodiacal background; d) earth-shine background; e) dark current; f) total background; g) integration time needed to reach background-limited performance, set at an equivalent readout noise of 20 electrons.
The selection of which sample sequence type (RAPID, SPARS, STEP; Section 7.7.3) must take into account the science goals and the restrictions placed on their use. Most observers have found that the SPARS ramps best meet the needs of their programs. Here are some factors to consider when selecting a sample sequence:
• STEP ramps are preferable where large dynamic range is needed; e.g., for photometry of stellar clusters. These ramps begin with a sequence of four uniform (RAPID) reads and end with a sequence of much longer uniform reads. The transition between the two uniform read rates is provided by a short sequence of logarithmically increasing read times. This design provides for correction of any non-linearities early in the exposure and allows for increased dynamic range for both bright and faint targets.Finally, the selection of a given sample sequence type should also be made in conjunction with the number of samples (nsamp) that will be used to achieve the desired total exposure time for the observation. Long exposures should in general use a minimum of 5-6 samples in order to allow for reliable CR rejection and to allow for at least a few unsaturated samples of bright targets in the field. For very faint targets in read-noise limited exposures, a larger number of samples will result in greater reduction of the net read noise and a more reliable fit to sources with low signal. Short exposures of bright targets, on the other hand, can get by with fewer samples. This is especially true, for example, for the direct images that accompany grism observations. Because the purpose of the direct image is to simply measure the location of sources - as opposed to accurate photometry - they can reliably use an nsamp of only 2 or 3.Table 7.12: Optimal exposure time needed to reach background-limited performance (see Table 7.11) for each WFC3/IR filter, along with the NSAMP=15 sequences that provide the closest match. The benefits and disadvantages of each sequence type are discussed in the accompanying text.
7.10.4 Spatial ScansSpatial scanning is available with either WFC3 detector, UVIS or IR. Conceptually producing star trails on the IR detector is the same as producing star trails on the UVIS detector, with a few differences discussed in WFC3 ISR 2012-08. This document is recommended to anyone preparing a phase II proposal that uses spatial scans for any purpose. Spatial scans are discussed more extensively in Section 6.12.3 (UVIS imaging) and Section 8.6 (IR slitless spectroscopy). The former section describes star trails and the latter section describes spectra trailed perpendicular to the dispersion direction.7.10.5 PSF SubtractionIR imaging has been shown to be highly effective in detecting faint point sources near bright point sources (WFC3 ISR 2011-07). In this study, deep dithered exposures of a star were made at a variety of roll angles. Unsaturated exposures of a star, scaled down in flux to simulate faint companions of various magnitudes, were added to the deep exposures. The faintness of the companion that can be detected at a certain separation from the bright star depends on the degree of sophistication used to generate a reference image of the PSF to subtract from each set of dithered exposures. For a separation of 1.0 arcsec, five sigma detections could be made fairly easily for companions 8 or 9 magnitudes fainter than the bright star, and companions more than 12 magnitudes fainter than the bright star could be detected at separations of a few arcsec. Substantial improvements in detectability at separations less than about 2 arcsec could be made using the methodology described in the ISR to generate the reference PSF.If observers want to use stellar images to subtract the PSF from a target comprised of a point source and an extended source to detect or measure the extended source, they should keep several points in mind:
• If a single guide star is used for a visit, the roll angle drift results in position drift of the PSF on the detector, typically ~15 mas per orbit (~ 0.1 IR pix in ~45 minutes) at the center of the IR detector, but on rare occasions as large as ~50 mas per orbit (Section B.2 in the DrizzlePac Handbook).
• While Tiny Tim modeling is available for the WFC3 IR detector, it has not been optimized to reproduce observed PSFs. Progress has been made in understanding the short-comings in the model implemented in version 7.4 (WFC3 ISR 2012-13, WFC3 ISR 2014-10). See Section 7.6.4 for a discussion of on-going work to provide PSF models to observers.New guide stars are generally needed for pointing offsets greater than about 2 arcmin within a visit. The length of guide star acquisitions (Table 10.1) limits the number of such offsets that can be observed during a single orbit. However, if no new guide star is acquired between pointings, the overhead decreases dramatically and it is possible to fit a larger number of distinct pointings into a single orbit. Ever since Servicing Mission 4 in 2009, HST has had three working gyros at all times. In a standard guided exposure the pointing control system receives continuous corrections from the Fine Guidance Sensors. Turning off guiding merely stops the stream of corrections from the FGS and redirects the pointing control system to use information from the gyros alone. The effect of this switch is that the telescope begins to drift by typically 0.001 to 0.002 arcseconds per second and exposures longer than a minutes in gyro-only mode suffer reduced image quality along the drift axis.A typical exposure with the WFC3/IR detector is composed of multiple non-destructive, zero-overhead reads. The exposure time between reads can be set between 2.9 and 200 seconds, and for times up to 25 seconds the drift between them is less than 0.05 arcsec, or less than half of a 0.13 arcsec WFC3/IR pixel. The image obtained in the interval between two reads is simply the difference between two consecutive reads. Therefore, an unguided, gyro-controlled, 300 s exposure with 25 s reads effectively consists of 12 independent exposures that can be shifted and combined into a full resolution image with hot pixels and cosmic rays removed. The procedure is illustrated in Figure 7.15.The term DASH (for “drift-and-shift”, Momcheva et al., 2016) has been adopted to describe this observing strategy. It can also be applied to short UVIS exposures. Observers should carefully consider the offset pattern to minimize the length of moves. Offsets up to 1.0 degree are possible with a small angle maneuver (SAM); however, the repositioning overheads increase with the offset size. Overheads for small and large SAMs are shown in Table 10.1 and in WFC3 STAN Issue 23, respectively. Details on planning DASH observations are also presented in the STAN article.Figure 7.15: Illustration of the “drift and shift” (DASH) method of restoring unguided WFC3/IR images. (a) Shows the standard data product (the FLT file) of an unguided, gyro-controlled exposure. The objects are smeared due to the lack of fine guidance sensor corrections. (b) Shows an example of the individual samples that comprise the final exposure. The smearing is small in each individual sample. (c) Shows the reconstructed image after shifting the samples to a common frame and adding them.