S T A N / W F P C 2 - Number 18, August 1996
CONTENTS:
- WFPC2 NEWS:
- Progress Report on WFPC2 PSF Characterization
- Change in Calibration Dark Files
- New Software to Identify Bias Jumps in WFPC2 Data Goes Online
- Dithering, Drizzling and Cosmic Rays
- WFPC2 Phase 1 Preparation Resources on WWW
- RECENT PREPRINTS
- APPENDIX: WFPC2 CONTACTS
Progress Report on WFPC2 PSF Characterization:
by J. Surdej, S. Baggett, M. S. Wiggs
Making use of numerous F555W, F814W and F439W PC observations of
the standard star GRW+70D5824 obtained in the context of the HST
calibration proposal 6179 "Photometric zero points", we have been
able to characterize the behaviour of the PSF in view of future
applications such as PSF fitting photometry (especially useful in
crowded fields), PSF subtraction, decomposition and/or image
deconvolution.
As far as the photometric results are concerned, we have found that the
use of a composite PSF constructed from optimally selected ranges
in positions and breathing values (i.e. similar relative focus positions
with respect to the nominal one) leads to single photometric values
affected by an RMS of typically 0.01 - 0.02 mag. Breathing is defined as
the change in focus caused by thermal cycling as the spacecraft goes from
day to night each orbit. Very acceptable PSF residuals have also
been derived after subtracting such composite PSFs from real
observations. Therefore, we are in the process of populating a
WFPC2 PSF library with individual and composite observed PSFs
characterized by multiple keywords such as the relevant WFPC2
detector, filter, X and Y center positions of the target on the
detector, central peak intensity, relative focus value if
available (breathing dependent), CCD gain, etc.
A WWW tool is currently under construction to permit HST users to
query the WFPC2 PSF library database on some of these keywords and
then grab the desired image files. Access to the observed WFPC2 PSF
library via the WWW tool should be made available to the HST community
later this Fall. An Instrument Science Report presenting more details
on the above results will also be soon available.
If you have WFPC2 PSF observations of your own which might be useful to
include in the PSF library, or if you have comments on the construction
of the library, please contact help@stsci.edu.
Change in Calibration Dark Files:
by S. Baggett, S. Casertano, M. S. Wiggs, M. Mutchler
Starting August 1, we have modified the procedure by which the dark
reference files used in the default calibration pipeline are obtained.
Previously, such dark files were generated by combining the dark
frames - usually 10 - obtained in the week of the observation and in
the previous week. The two week time frame was a compromise between
noise in the dark frame (which would have been improved by a longer
baseline) and timeliness of the information about hot pixels, which
change on a daily scale. In the new system, the dark is obtained by
combining a superdark, composed of 120 individual darks obtained
over the last year, and a weekly dark, usually comprising 5 dark
images. If the dark current in the weekly dark differs from the
superdark value by more than a certain threshold, the value is taken
from the weekly dark: the implication is that the pixel is probably
hot, and thus the more recent value is preferred. If the dark current
differs by less than the threshold, the more precise value from the
superdark is preferred. With this scheme, the noise is minimized for
the majority of the pixels where there is no indication of change,
while at the same time new hot pixels are tracked properly. The
threshold is set at 5 times the 3-sigma-clipped rms dispersion of the
pixels in the weekly dark, measured separately in the four chips; the
value actually used is reported in a HISTORY comment in the header.
The hot pixels (those whose value comes from the weekly dark) are
identified in the associated Data Quality file by setting either the
10th or the 11th least significant bit (values 512 or 1024). The
value 1024 is used if the pixel value is close (within 0.003 e/s) to
the value from the previous week; such pixels can be considered
"fixable", since their dark current has remained stable. The value
512 is used if the dark current differs from the previous week's value
by more than 0.003 e/s; such pixels are probably "new" hot pixels, and
dark current subtraction is inherently more uncertain, since its value
changed some time within the previous week. This use of the values
512 and 1024 is consistent with that of the task for warm pixel
correction, warmpix, recently made available as part of the latest
STSDAS release. In addition, the second least significant bit is set
(value of 2) if the pixel value is flagged in the dark frame from
which it is taken; this happens, for example, if an insufficient
number of the weekly dark frames contained a valid value (multiple CR
hits, image residuals).
New Software to Identify Bias Jumps in WFPC2 Data Goes Online:
by C. O'Dea, M. McMaster, and J.C. Hsu
As part of the effort to automate the data quality assessment of HST
data, the WFPC2 group has developed an algorithm to identify bias jumps
in WFPC2 images. In the past, these regions were identified by members
of the OPUS staff who manually looked at each image on a workstation and
informed the observers of the anomaly. As of August 9, the calibration
pipeline performs this task automatically. Besides saving manual labor,
the new software provides a more objective and more sensitive method of
finding bias jumps. Currently our procedure is the following (note that
the exact criteria may evolve as we gain more experience with bias jump
detection). In CALWP2, a routine examines a subset (from columns 5 to 14)
of the bias strip (.x0h file) and determines and compares the mean values
in 8 bins along the bias columns. Any change in the bias level greater
than 0.09 DN is noted in the trailer and header files for the calibrated
images. For jumps greater than 0.5 DN a warning message is issued in these
two files and is also placed in the PDQ file for that observation.
Note that large changes in the bias level can also occur if there is a
highly saturated star or missing data in the image.
At this point in time the message is purely informational and no correction
is done within CALWP2. The bias jumps can be corrected by the observer
if so desired using separate bias levels for the appropriate ranges of
rows. Please see ISR 95-06, "A Field Guide to WFPC2 Image Anomalies",
for instructions on how to correct for bias jumps.
Dithering, Drizzling and Cosmic Rays:
by A. Fruchter
As is well known by WFPC2 users, the pixelation of the PC substantially
undersamples the HST point spread function (PSF) in the blue, and the
WF undersamples the PSF thoughout the optical spectrum. Although much
high spatial frequency information in the image is permanently
destroyed by smearing with the response of the "fat" pixels, the
quality of the image can nevertheless be greatly improved by combining
sub-pixel dithered images. In sub-pixel dithering, the pointing of the
telescope is moved by small non-integral pixel amounts between
exposures. Each of the pixels from the different exposures can then be
thought of as sampling a final, higher-resolution image, which is the
"true image" of the sky convolved with the optical PSF and the
pixel-response function of the CCD. If the dithers are particularly
well-placed, one can simply interlace the pixels from the images on a
finer grid, but in practice imperfect offsets, and the effect of the
geometric distortion on offsets as small as one arcsecond, can make
interlacing quite difficult.
Another standard simple linear technique for combining shifted images,
descriptively named "shift-and-add", has been used for many years to
combine dithered infrared data on a finer grid. However, it is
difficult to use shift-and-add in the presence of missing data (e.g.
from cosmic-rays) and geometric distortion. Furthermore, shift-and-add
again convolves the image with the "fat" pixel, causing an additional
loss of resolution. In the presence of small shifts, where geometric
distortion is not significant, one can also use Richardson-Lucy
Bayesian image restoration, which is incorporated in STSDAS through the
task acoadd, written by Richard Hook and Leon Lucy. However, in
addition to being unable to handle large dithers, the present
implementation of this technique is limited by typical computing
capabilities to combining either small regions of many images, or the
entire image. In addition, the present task cannot accomodate the
changing shape of the PSF across the WFPC field of view, and the
Richardson-Lucy method, like all non-linear techniques, produces final
images whose noise properties are difficult to quantify.
For purposes of combining the dithered images of the Hubble Deep Field,
Richard Hook and I developed a new algorithm for the linear combination
of images known formally as variable-pixel linear reconstruction and
informally as "drizzling." Drizzling can be thought of as a set of
linear "functionals" that vary smoothly from the optimum linear
combination technique -- interlacing -- to the old-standby,
shift-and-add. The degree to which one must depart from interlacing
and move towards shift-and-add is determined by the nature of the input
data. Drizzling naturally handles both missing data and geometric
distortion, and can largely remove the effect on photometry produced by
the geometric distortion of the WFPC camera. We have now improved the
code used in the HDF, making it more versatile, user-friendly, and far
less CPU-intensive. This code will be incorporated into future
versions of STSDAS. However, for those who wish to use the code in the
near future, we plan on releasing Drizzle V1.0 on September 15, and
making it available via the WWW. The code is written in fortran, and
uses the IRAF F77/VOS library. It has been tested extensively on
Solaris Unix, but should work on any IRAF V2.10 installation supporting
F77/VOS. Installation of the software is quite simple. A "poster"
paper which describes drizzling can be found at:
http://www.stsci.edu/~fruchter/dither/dither.html
This page also provides links to other documents about dithering and
will provide the address for retrieval of the drizzle software. Users
should also see the WFPC2 FAQ WWW page for further information about
dithering.
Ivo Busko and I are presently working on a suite of IRAF tasks that
will help users measure the offsets between dithered HST observations.
We have based these on the cross-correlation tasks used in processing
the HDF. We expect these tasks to enter wide-spread testing by the
WFPC group in September, and hope to make them widely available shortly
thereafter.
Finally, many observers will be interested to know that substantial
progress has been made on using the drizzle code to remove cosmic rays
from dithered images. Although the process involved requires multiple
drizzles, and at least one inversion of the drizzle process, the
computer resources required should be well within the means of most
observers. The poster paper mentioned above displays an image created
from twelve 2400s HST WF2 images, no two of which had the same pointing
and each of which had approximately 5% of the pixels corrupted by
cosmic rays.
We are now working to determine the degree to which one can remove
cosmic rays while insuring accurate stellar photometry, as well as the
minimum number of dithered images necessary to do an acceptable job of
cosmic ray removal. The results so far are encouraging, and suggest
that a significant number of users may be able to forego integral
dithers or multiple images at a single dither position. We expect to
report further on our progress before the next round of Phase II
proposals are due.
WFPC2 Phase 1 Preparation Resources on WWW:
by J. Biretta
On-line resources useful for Phase 1 proposal preparation,
including the new WFPC2 Handbook and the Exposure Time Calculator,
have been collected on a single WWW page which can be accessed
via the WFPC2 Homepage.
RECENT PREPRINTS:
We draw your attention to these papers, based on WF/PC and WFPC2 data, that
will appear in the next few months. This list includes all preprints received
by the STScI Library not yet published in the journals. Please remember to
include our Library in your preprint distribution list.
FERRARESE, L.; LIVIO, M.; FREEDMAN, W.; SAHA, A.; STETSON,
P.B.; FORD, H.C.; HILL, R.J.; MADORE, B.F. "Discovery of a
nova in the Virgo cluster M100" ApJ accepted
SAHA, A.; SANDAGE, A.; LABHARDT, L.; TAMMANN, G.A.;
MACCHETTO, F.D.; PANAGIA, N. "Cepheid calibration of the
peak brightness of SNe Ia. VI. SN 1960F in NGC 4496A" ApJS
12-96
WILLIAMS, R.E.; BLACKER, B.; DICKINSON, M.; VAN DYKE DIXON,
W.; FERGUSON, H.C.; FRUCHTER, A; GIAVALISCO, M.; GILLILAND,
R.L.; HEYER, I.; KATSANIS, R.; LEVAY, Z.; LUCAS, R.A.;
MCELROY, D.B.; PETRO, L.; POSTMAN, M.; ADORF, H.-M.; HOOK,
R.N. "The Hubble Deep Field: observations, data reduction,
and galaxy photometry" AJ 10-96
BELL, J.F. III; WOLFF, M.J.; JAMES, P.B.; CLANCY, R.T.;
LEE, S.W.; MARTIN, L.J. "Mars surface mineralogy form
Hubble Space Telescope imaging during 1994-1995:
observations, calibration, and initial results" JGR-Planets
FORBES, D.A. "Globular cluster luminosity functions and
the Hubble constant from WFPC2 imaging: galaxies in the
Coma I cloud" AJ accepted
GRILLMAIR, C.J.; LAUER, T.R.; WORTHEY, G.; FABER, S.M.;
FREEDMAN, W.L.; MADORE, B.F.; AJHAR, E.A.; BAUM, W.A.;
HOLTZMAN, J.A.; LYNDS, C.R. "Hubble Space Telescope
observations of M32: the color-magnitude diagram" AJ
LAUER, T.R.; TREMAINE, S.; AJHAR, E.A.; BENDER, R.;
DRESSLER, A.; FABER, S.M.; GEBHARDT, K.; GRILLMAIR, C.;
KORMENDY, J.; RICHSTONE, D. "Hubble Space Telescope
observations of the double nucleus of NGC 4486B" ApJ
SIMPSON, C.; WILSON, A.S.; BOWER, G.; HECKMAN, T.M.;
KROLIK, J.H.; MILEY, G.K. "A one-sided ionization cone in
the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 5643" ApJ 1-1-97
HEATHCOTE, S.; MORSE, J.A.; HARTIGAN, P.; REIPURTH, B.;
SCHWARTZ, R.D.; BALLY, J.; STONE, J.M. "Hubble Space
Telescope observations of the HH47 jet: narrow band images"
MADAU, P.; FERGUSON, H.C.; DICKINSON, M.E.; GIAVALISCO, M.;
STEIDEL, C.C.; FRUCHTER, A. "High redshift galaxies in the
Hubble Deep Field. Color selection and star formation
history to z ~ 4" MNRAS accepted
MORRISSEY, P.F.; FELDMAN, P.D.; CLARKE, J.T.; WOLVEN, B.C.;
STROBEL, D.F.; DURRANCE, S.T.; TRAUGER, J.T. "Simultaneous
spectroscopy and imaging of the Jovian aurora with the
Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope and the Hubble Space
Telescope"
APPENDIX: WFPC2 Contacts:
Any questions about the scheduling of your observations should be
addressed to
your Program Coordinator. Post-Observation questions can be addressed to your
Contact Scientist. If you do not know who these persons are, you can find the
information on the WWW at http://www.stsci.edu/public/propinfo.html.
Analysis, STSDAS or any other questions can also be addressed to
help@stsci.edu.
To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to listserv@stsci.edu with
the Subject: line blank and the following in the body:
[un]subscribe wfpc_news YOUR NAME
The Space Telescope Science Institute is operated by the Association of
Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract
NAS 5-26555.
|
 |
|