MINUTES OF SHARE MEETING 4/25/01 We started with a series of planned presentations on the status of several "works in progress": 1. Daryl Swade gave us a summary of OTFR and its implications. OTFR changes our notion of an archive from "stored calibrated data" to "stored telemetry and s/w needed to process and calibrate it". This makes it an "active archive". 2. Paolo Padovani talked about the data "scrapbook" being rolled out by the archive: - Prototype for release by June AAS meeting - Delivers previews for all bands/instruments at a given point/object on the sky - SHARE should provide input on where to go next - This process has provided databases that now make it possible to do searches like "all WFPC2 images with > 1 filter at a given location." 3. ACS pipeline described by Bill Sparks and Marc Postman 1- alignment module - get registration right 2- PyDrizzle 3- sextractor - object detection, photometry, classification 4- BPZ - Bayesian Photometric Redshift algorithm 5- Morphological fits - bulge/disk decomposition etc. 4. ECF/WFPC2 Processing - Defining WFPC2 associations to produce stacked images. Had to recreate some jitter files. Uses a PRE-BUILT CATALOGUE to be delivered later this year. - Basically restricted to CR-SPLIT images - Can't deal with dithered images 5. New archive distribution system slated for August - Will deliver compressed data, different formats, selected files. - No accounts will be required for public data. - Will handle multimission data. We then heard from various committee members on a wish list of potential processing/reprocessing ideas for SHARE to consider in its implementation timetable: 1. Anton K. - Produce generalized overlap/combined/drizzled images - Allow different representations - color images, contours 2. Mark D. - Discussed crucial science issues that are important prior to producing ditheredimages: How good is my astrometry? ==> Tune-up the WCS as a post-processing step. This may give a better starting point for cross-correlation registration techniques. As an example, SIRTF in working on identifying 2MASS stars in their images as astrometric references. 3. Bill S. - agreed that better astrometry and WCS updates were important - As a value added-product for later use, it would be good to enhance the data quality array-- create a unique mask for CRs and hot pixels for each image and save it. By email, Dorothy F. suggested the following (brief summary-- she sent emails to the full group): - If users create valuable products, encourage them to submit them to the archive. - Consider encouraging users to write processes for OTFR implementation - More generalized searches across the archive - Allow the use to choose the delivery media (charge, if necessary) - SHARE group should discuss qulaity information associated with a data set. - Specific special processing examples: * Create an image in wavelength band(s) at * Create a spectrum covering for * Process data sets with the provided calibration files * Process data sets with the calibration algorithm provided by the user