Next: The Data Up: WFPC Image Restoration and Previous: Introduction

The Choice of Camera and the Undersampling Problem

At wavelengths below 820nm, the Planetary Camera, with pixel size of 43 mas, undersamples the theoretical resolution of the 2.4m HST aperture. In spite of this, we chose to observe Pictor A with the PC because the ability of the CCD detector to accept high photon count rates would minimize observing time and maximize signal to noise in the fainter, defuse regions adjacent to the nucleus. The predicted detectable flux from the point source nucleus was 100 photons pixel s while the saturation limit on the FOC, which is not undersampled, is 0.5 photons pixel s, requiring a factor of 200 attenuation to avoid saturation and thus a factor of 200 more observing time to obtain the same S/N in the faint, diffuse regions, as the PC.

With the aberrated images, it was necessary to increase the observing time by a factor of 7 over the unaberrated exposures to compensate for the increased photon noise from the scattered light in the diffuse regions surrounding the nucleus. This is roughly the same factor by which the nuclear photon count rate is attenuated by the aberration and thus does not render the FOC any more attractive for this project.


rlw@stsci.edu