[Top] [Prev] [Next] [Bottom]
32.2 Mechanism Stability
This section discusses non-repeatable motions of moving parts in the FOS optics-these motions would position the image of the aperture at different physical locations on the photocathode. These positional uncertainties affected the following:
32.2.1 Filter-Grating Wheel Non-Repeatability
Although the positions of the filter-grating wheel (FGW) in the beam were stabilized by so-called detents or notches, there was still some mechanical variability of the wheel position, even at the same detent, from observation to observation. The x-component of any FGW residual positioning uncertainty caused an offset in the observed wavelengths from the calibrated dispersion curve. Additionally, any offset in either x or y added a small uncertainty to the flatfield calibration.
The amplitude of the FGW mechanism positioning uncertainty is discussed thoroughly in FOS ISRs 145 and 142. The 1
FGW non-repeatability determined in those ISRs was 0.12 diodes or approximately 0.47 quarter-stepped pixels. Recent analysis of a larger set of FGW motions indicates a peak-to-peak maximum displacement of 0.5 diode width (+/- 125 km/sec at high dispersion) with no changes over the lifetime of the FOS.
Summary of FGW Motion
32.2.2 Aperture Wheel Non-Repeatability
There was no reason to believe that aperture wheel non-repeatability contributed significantly to errors in FOS spectra. Pre-launch measurements indicate the variability was very small. Attempts to measure these on orbit are discussed in FOS ISR 131 and were limited by residual GIM motion (0.02 diodes 1
). Pre-launch measurements indicated a non-repeatability an order of magnitude smaller than on-orbit GIM motion residuals.
[Top] [Prev] [Next] [Bottom]
stevens@stsci.edu
Copyright © 1997, Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy. All rights
reserved.
Last updated: 01/14/98 14:55:10