Tracing accretion disk winds across the electromagnetic spectrum in BHXRBs

This target is not used in this proposal. Resubmission now with the right ETC IDs for the aqc image Switched from BLIND-OFFSET Target ACQ to normal imaging, but now with MIRRORB NOTE: I get an error at submission: "Orbit planner and visit planner does not connect to the server" -2147177384 ----- Attempting Submission 1 (Mon Feb 17 12:00:15 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-1 ----- Attempting Submission 2 (Thu Feb 20 11:19:02 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-2 ----- Attempting Submission 3 (Fri Feb 28 19:37:13 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 4 (Fri Feb 28 20:26:02 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-4 ----- Attempting Submission 5 (Fri Feb 28 21:36:15 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 6 (Tue Mar 03 22:54:13 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 7 (Wed Mar 04 12:07:19 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 8 (Wed Mar 11 14:31:04 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-8 ----- Attempting Submission 9 (Thu Mar 12 12:14:18 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 10 (Thu Mar 12 18:30:29 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-10 ----- Attempting Submission 11 (Fri Mar 13 13:08:07 GMT 2020) ----- HST Phase II Proposal 16066 successfully submitted. Receipt: # 16066-11 ----- Attempting Submission 12 (Fri Mar 13 14:08:45 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 14 (Fri Mar 13 18:26:15 GMT 2020) ----- Your proposal could not be saved. Submission aborted. Your proposal could not be saved. Submission aborted. ----- Attempting Submission 15 (Fri Mar 13 19:15:26 GMT 2020) ----- Orbit planner and visit planner does not connect to the server Illegal selection: 27. Cannot find file /Users/blacker/SPD-Support/Joint-XMM/xmm_hst-AO19/Proposals/86560_PROP.pdf Please specify your scheduling constraints or 'No Constraints' on all Observation forms. 0 Tracing accretion disk winds across the electromagnetic spectrum in BHXRBs During their soft state edge-on black hole transients show blue-shifted absorption lines in their X-ray spectra due to hot and equatorial disk winds. Blue-shifted absorption lines have also been discovered in optical and ultraviolet(UV). These features must be produced in an outflow, but the physical conditions required to form them are very different. The three feautures have never been observed at the same time. It is unclear if they are linked to distinct outflows or simply with different regions. We propose to answer this question with simultaneous time-resolved spectroscopy of a high-inclination soft-state system in the X-ray, UV and optical bands. This will allow us to test if the three types of wind features are present simultaneously and whether they display correlated variability. We will observe LMXRB in the soft state coordinated with XMM-Newton. Ideally we will have 3 visits, at the begining, mid and end of the XMM exposure, in order to swarch for simultaneous accretion disk winds in the X-ray and FUV. None Required Stellar Physics and Stellar Types 6 false false false false false false false SUPPORTED STAR ACCRETION DISK JET WIND X-RAY NOVAE NO J2000 1.04 +/- 0.07 x 10^-15 ergs/s/cm^2/A at 1928A (Swift/UVOT UW2) on 26 Feb The LMXRB has to be above the detection limit in the COS FUV COS/FUV Spectroscopic No No G140L 1105 1584123492272 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 28.0. CASM was run in Phase II mode. 1583164628000 273.18022320274525 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "01" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20191203" :date "13-Mar-2020 18:18:11.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 521968 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "01" :obset-id "01" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "01" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2443 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 114 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 3145 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "01" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2564 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 3145 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "01" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2640 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 388 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 3145 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 ToO I tried different spectral configurations for the target aquisition: COS.ta.1417131 COS.ta.1417132 COS.ta.1417134 Otther spetral shapes are considered here: COS.sp.1416844 COS.sp.1416867 COS.sp.1416865 1584123727790 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 28.0. CASM was run in Phase II mode. 1583524927000 271.7958617582636 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "51" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20191203" :date "13-Mar-2020 18:22:07.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 539360 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "51" :obset-id "51" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "51" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2529 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 124 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "51" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 86 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "51" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 388 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 I tried different spectral configurations for the target aquisition: COS.ta.1423594 COS.ta.1423593 Otther spetral shapes are considered here: COS.sp.1416844 COS.sp.1416867 COS.sp.1416865 1584123280800 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 28.0. CASM was run in Phase II mode. (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "52" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20191203" :date "13-Mar-2020 18:14:39.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 495888 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "52" :obset-id "52" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "52" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2529 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "52" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 86 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "52" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 388 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 Otther spetral shapes are considered here: COS.sp.1416844 COS.sp.1416867 COS.sp.1416865 1584123267792 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 28.0. CASM was run in Phase II mode. (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "53" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20191203" :date "13-Mar-2020 18:14:27.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 495888 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "53" :obset-id "53" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "53" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2529 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "53" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 86 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16066 :visit-id "53" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 302 :si-vis-utilization 2620 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 388 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2922 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 Otther spetral shapes are considered here: COS.sp.1416844 COS.sp.1416867 COS.sp.1416865