The number of orbits used exceeds the number allocated This resubmission incorporates new visits approved by the TTRB to address guide-star failures during the original observations for Visits 1C, 2C, and 4C. Specifically: Visit AC (3 orbits) replans the first 3 orbits of Visit 1C (HOPR 92065) Visit BC (3 orbits) replans Orbits 2, 3, and 4 of Visit 2C (HOPR 92066) Visit DC (4 orbits) replans Visit 4C in its entirety (HOPR 92067) The implementation of each of the new visits was tweaked to accommodate current constraints (e.g., to avoid orbital over-runs) and maximize exposure times. Resubmission #2 incorporates new visits approved by the TTRB to address guide-star failures for Visits AC and DC. Specifically: Visit FC (3 orbits) is a copy of Visit 1C (HOPR 92164) Visit IC (1 orbit) replans the 4th and final orbit of Visit DC ( HOPR 92163). The sub-exposures and buffer times were reduced to accommodate a dispersed-light TA within the single orbit. Resubmission #3 incorporates Visit KC to address guide-star reacquisition failures in Visit FC. As approved by HOPR 92204, Visit KC (1.7 orbits) reproduces the COS G130M/1096 exposures for FP-POS=1 and FP-POS=2 from Visit FC. The second orbit is intentionally not filled to comply with the TTRBs instructions. -569418689 ----- Attempting Submission 1 (Sun Oct 25 19:56:15 GMT 2020) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 2 (Fri Aug 20 17:34:35 GMT 2021) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 3 (Wed Feb 09 17:43:47 GMT 2022) ----- ----- Attempting Submission 4 (Wed Apr 20 20:45:19 GMT 2022) ----- The orbital allocation overrun results from labelling Visit DC as "complete" rather than "partially complete". Only 3 of the 4 orbits planned for Visit DC acquired data. In response to HOPR 92163, the TTRB granted an additional orbit to recoup the lost data. This additional orbit is responsible for the apparent allocation overrun in this submission. The orbital allocation overrun in this submission is the result of Visit KC not being included in the database. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) Director has decided to devote up to 1000 orbits of Director's Discretionary time in observing Cycles 27-29 to a new Hubble Ultraviolet Legacy program focused on star formation and associated stellar physics. This new program, ULLYSES (UV Legacy Library of Young Stars as Essential Standards), will provide a UV spectroscopic reference sample of young (< 10 Myr) high- and low-mass stars. It will target over ~150 OB stars in the Magellanic Clouds and lower metallicity galaxies in the Local Group, and ~40 T Tauri stars and brown dwarfs in the Milky Way. In addition, ULLYSES will monitor 4 typical T Tauri stars over different rotational phases through at least three rotation periods, and over timescales of months to years. The resulting library will provide template spectra of massive stars at metallicities substantially below the well studied, while the low mass sample will cover a wide range of ages, accretion rates, and masses, including objects down to well below 0.5 M_sun. The legacy of this large UV dataset on the first 10 Myr of stellar evolution will be enhanced by complementary datasets obtained by the scientific community. In addition to the core goals of the program related to stellar astrophysics of low and high mass stars, this data will also enable exciting science in the fields of ISM, CGM, jets, and exoplanets. ULLYSES will be modeled after the Frontier Fields program: all data obtained will be non-proprietary. The implementation team at STScI is developing high-level science data products and a sophisticated database and website for disseminating data from the ULLYSES program and ancillary datasets for the ULLYSES target sample from space and ground-based facilities. This proposal includes a subset of the massive ULLYSES stars being observed in the Magellanic clouds. Depending on target brightness, the main FUV spectral range will generally use either the STIS E140M setting or the combination of the COS c1291 + c1611 settings. Sufficiently bright stars without good FUSE data in the archive will also be observed with the COS c1096 setting to provide coverage at shorter wavelengths. Where time permits, stars of type O9 or later will also be observed with STIS E230M/1978, while for supergiants of spectral type B5 or later E230M/2707 may also be included. Where possible, targets of a given spectral type were selected to span both a range in extinction and in rotation rates to support a variety of stellar and ISM studies. Signal-to-noise requirements used to determine the desired exposures times were defined as follows: COS/G130M/c1096: 20 / nine-pixel resel at 1080 A COS/G130M/c1291: 30 / six-pixel resel at 1150 A COS/G160M/c1611: 30 / six-pixel resel at 1590 A COS/G185M/c1953: 30 / three-pixel resel at 1860 A COS/G185M/c1986: 30 / three-pixel resel at 1980 A STIS/E140M/c1425: 20 / two-pixel resel at 1200 A STIS/E230M/c1978: 20 / two-pixel resel at 1800 A STIS/E230M/c2707: 20 / two-pixel resel at 2800 A The actual implemented exposure times may be adjusted to efficiently use HST orbits, but should always provide at least 80% of the desired time as defined by the above requirements. Additional details about the scientific motivation and technical implementation strategy of the ULLYSES observations can be found at http://www.stsci.edu/stsci-research/research-topics-and-programs/ullyses. The ULLYSES program is based on the recommendations of a working group led by Sally Oey; the full text of that group's report can be found at http://www.stsci.edu/files/live/sites/www/files/home/stsci-research/research-topics-and-programs/ullyses/_documents/HSTUV-report-ULLYSES.pdf. 0 false SUPPORTED EXT-STAR SUPERGIANT O OF NO 2DFS-2266 : [2dFS]-2266, [2dFS]_2266, 2dFS 2266 Previous name : [2dFS]-2266 Input file: SMC_2020Feb20/input/SMC_all_do1_NewCoords_pids.csv SIMBAD link (2dFS 2266): https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=2dFS+2266&submit=submit+id SpT = OC7 II(f) COS/G130M/c1096 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) COS/G130M/c1291 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) COS/G160M/c1611 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1921 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1953 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1986 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) STIS/E140M/c1425 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) STIS/E230M/c1978 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) STIS/E230M/c2707 : rn(WM-Basic(O7.5 I, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.97, log_g=3.40) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson B mag=14.990 vegamag) Coordinate pedigree: Gaia Calculation performed 2020-02-24T17:57:46, v0.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tstatus; 2DFS-2266; P/COS approved for submission; S/ins not started; P/AF 20/08/20; S/xx DD/MM/YY tcheck; APT/SIMBAD target names: ; 2DFS-2266, '2dFS 2266' ... Default name in SIMBAD is OGLE SMC-SC11 61507 tcheck; Target info verification status?; Verified tcheck; Coordinates & P.M. updated?; Gaia DR2 coords, Epoch 2015.5 tcheck; Adopted SED compared to Observations?; Yes ... PoWR models were selected according to the nominal SpT-Teff calibration for O7 I and O7 III classifications to bracket the OC7 II(f) classification of 2dFS 2266. For both models, the flux was scaled to the distance of the SMC and attenuated by an SMCbar extinction law with E(B-V) = 0.02 (2002ApJS..141...81M). The flux associated with both models had to be reduced substantially to match the available UBV photometry, which suggests that the star is less luminous (i.e., has a smaller radius) than modeled. A model corresponding to an O7 III star with flux reduced by a factor of 0.14 was ultimately adopted. It corresponds to the file: PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed.fits Adopted illustrated: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed_vs_UBV.png Adopted SED: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits The far-UV flux is uncertain because (a) the normalization is set by UBV photometry; and (b) the star is evidently only lightly reddened. M2002-SMC-65577 J2000 SpT=OC7 II(f); E(B-V)=0.02; U = 13.83; B=14.91; V=15.16 EXT-STAR MAIN SEQUENCE O OF NO 2DFS-3954 : [2dFS]-3954, [2dFS]_3954, 2dFS 3954 Previous name : [2dFS]-3954 Input file: SMC_2020Feb20/input/SMC_all_do1_NewCoords_pids.csv SIMBAD link (2dFS 3954): https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=2dFS+3954&submit=submit+id SpT = O6 V((f))z COS/G130M/c1096 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) COS/G130M/c1291 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) COS/G160M/c1611 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1921 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1953 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) COS/G185M/c1986 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) STIS/E140M/c1425 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) STIS/E230M/c1978 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) STIS/E230M/c2707 : rn(WM-Basic(O7 V, Z=0.004, Teff=39811, log_lum=5.42, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.020), johnson U mag=13.930 vegamag) Coordinate pedigree: Gaia Calculation performed 2020-02-24T17:57:32, v0.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tstatus; 2DFS-3954; P/COS approved for submission; S/ins not started; P/AF 20/08/20; S/xx DD/MM/YY tcheck; APT/SIMBAD target names: ; 2DFS-3954; "2dFS 3954" tcheck; Target info verification status?; Verified ... SIMBAD lists the spectral type as 07 V (from 2004MNRAS.353..601E), but ULLYSES has adopted O6 V((f))z (from 2019A&A...625A.104R) tcheck; Coordinates & P.M. updated?; Gaia DR2, Epoch 2015.5 tcheck; Adopted SED compared to Observations?; Yes ... A PoWR model was selected according to the nominal SpT-Teff calibration: (Teff, logg, logMdot, Z/Zsun) = (37000, 4.00, -7.13, 0.14). The model flux was scaled to the distance of the SMC and attenuated by an SMCbar extinction law with E(B-V) = 0.03 (2002ApJS..141...81M). A good match to the observed IUE/SWP and IUE/LWP fluxes and UBV photometry required a reduction in the overall flux level by a factor of 0.5. An equally good match was obtained by using a model with a slightly larger logg of 4.20. Since this model is for a more compact object, its flux only required reduction by a factor of 0.9 to achieve the match. The adopted SED corresponds to the file: PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits. The parameters of this model agree closely with those determined by Ramachandran et al. (2019A&A...625A.104R). Adopted illustrated: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed_vs_IUE.png Adopted SED: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fits M2002-SMC-83639 J2000 SpT=O6 V((f))z; E(B-V)=0.02; U=13.93; B=15.01; V=15.27 EXT-STAR WOLF RAYET - WN NO 2DFS-999 : SMC AB9, SMC-WR9, SMC AB 9 Previous name : SMC-WR9 Input file: SMC_2020Feb20/input/SMC_all_do1_NewCoords_pids.csv SIMBAD link (SMC AB 9): https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=SMC+AB+9&submit=submit+id SpT = WN3ha COS/G130M/c1096 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) COS/G130M/c1291 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) COS/G160M/c1611 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1921 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1953 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1986 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) STIS/E140M/c1425 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) STIS/E230M/c1978 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) STIS/E230M/c2707 : rn-max(CMFGEN-WN(model=10, Z=0.004, Teff=90000) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=1.6e-13 Flam) Coordinate pedigree: 2MASS Calculation performed 2020-02-24T18:03:34, v0.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tstatus; 2DFS-999; P/COS approved for submission; S/ins not started; P/AF 20/08/20; S/xx DD/MM/YY tcheck; APT/SIMBAD target names: ; 2DFS-999, "2dFS 999" ... Default name in SIMBAD is "SMC AB 9" tcheck; Target info verification status?; Verified tcheck; Coordinates & P.M. updated?; 2MASS J2000 tcheck; Adopted SED compared to Observations?; Yes ... The detailed analysis of the spectrum of 2dFS 999 = SMC AB 9 by Hainich et al. (2015A&A...581A..21H) provided the starting point for the selection of a model spectrum. A model with very similar parameters to those determined by Hainich et al. was selected from the PoWR grid for WR stars with SMC metallicity and a hydrogen abundance of 0.40 by mass. The model flux was scaled to the distance of the SMC and attenuated by an SMCbar extinction law with E(B-V) = 0.07. This reddening is slightly lower than the value derived by Hainich et al. (0.095), but well within the uncertainties of the photometry. An additional scaling factor of 3.3 was required to get a good match to the available FUSE spectrum and UBV photometry, and is presumably an indication that the luminosity of the model does not exactly match the luminosity of 2dFS 999. As noted by Hainich et al., the continuum flux level of the FUSE spectrum of 2dFS 999 changes abruptly by a factor of about two for wavelengths shorter than 1000 Angstroms, most likely because the SiC channels were not well aligned at the time of the observation. Consequently, only wavelengths longer than 1000 Angstroms were considered when selecting the model atmosphere. Contamination from other sources within the LWRS aperture may also be an issue, though most of these targets appear to be late-type stars. 2dFS 999 may be in a binary system with an O-type companion, but no allowance was made for this possibility when selecting the spectrum. The adopted SED corresponds to the file PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed.fits. Fit by Hainich et al: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2015A+A...581A..21H_FigC4.pdf Adopted illustrated: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed_vs_FUSE.png Adopted SED: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits SMC-AB-9 M2002-SMC-30420 J2000 SpT=WN3ha; E(B-V)=0.09; u=14.13; B=15.12; V=15.24; F1160=1.62e-13 EXT-STAR MAIN SEQUENCE O NO AV251 : [M2002]-48672, [M2002]_48672, AzV 251 Previous name : [M2002]-48672 Input file: SMC_2020Feb20/input/SMC_all_do1_NewCoords_pids.csv SIMBAD link (AzV 251): https://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=AzV+251&submit=submit+id SpT = O7.5 V COS/G130M/c1096 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1160 +- 30.0A flux=3.2e-13 Flam) COS/G130M/c1291 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1360 +- 30.0A flux=2.4e-13 Flam) COS/G160M/c1611 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1921 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1953 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) COS/G185M/c1986 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) STIS/E140M/c1425 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1360 +- 30.0A flux=2.4e-13 Flam) STIS/E230M/c1978 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) STIS/E230M/c2707 : rn-max(WM-Basic(O7.5 V, Z=0.004, Teff=37154, log_lum=5.30, log_g=4.00) (extinction smcbar=0.090), flux1700 +- 5.0A flux=1.5e-13 Flam) Coordinate pedigree: Gaia Calculation performed 2020-02-24T17:59:09, v0.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tstatus; AV251; P/COS approved for submission; S/ins not started; P/AF 20/08/20; S/xx DD/MM/YY tcheck; APT/SIMBAD target names: ; AV251, "AzV 251" tcheck; Target info verification status?; Verified ... SIMBAD lists the spectral type as 07 Vn (from 1982PASP...94...31C), but ULLYSES has adopted O7.5 V (from 2016ApJ...817..113L) tcheck; Coordinates & P.M. updated?; Gaia DR2, Epoch 2015.5 tcheck; Adopted SED compared to Observations?; Yes ... A PoWR model was selected according to the nominal SpT-Teff calibration: (Teff, logg, logMdot, Z/Zsun) = (37000, 4.00, -7.13, 0.14). The model flux was scaled to the distance of the SMC and attenuated by an SMCbar extinction law with E(B-V) = 0.09 (2002ApJS..141...81M). Although it provided a good baseline fit to the available IUE low dispersion spectra and UBV photometry, an improved fit to the SWP spectrum was found with a slightly reduced reddening of E(B-V) = 0.06. This value is well within the uncertainty of the photometric measurements. The adopted SED corresponds to the file PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed.fits. Adopted illustrated: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed_vs_IUE.png Adopted SED: ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits M2002-SMC-48672 J2000 SpT=O7.5 V; E(B-V)=0.09; U=13.32; B=14.34; V=14.52; F1160=3.16e-13; F1360=2.43e-13; F1700=1.49e-13 1603476962764 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 1C; 2DFS-2266; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-2266 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes 2DFS-2266_DSS.png and 2DFS-2266_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 20 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed -none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 5 orbits - needed to treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually- see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 5 1627491633000 284.30020194972553 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20200619" :date "23-Oct-2020 14:16:02.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 5 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1469984 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :obset-id "1C" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2594 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 95 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2595.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 86.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2594 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :orbit-number 4 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2594 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "1C" :orbit-number 5 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2594 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 369 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 5 0 SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 25 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Waranings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2011.7618 s . See COS.sp.1461396. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2012 s (503 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2519.869, 530.739, 1989.131) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.036 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 936 s = 624 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 88% of the baseline: 1780 s total, 445 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.2/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461607, BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown 1603476952022 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 2C; 2DFS-3954; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-3954 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - 2DFS-3954_DSS.png and 2DFS_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 13 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 4 orbits - needed to reduce exposure times and treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually - see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 4 1627925998000 284.2440188580771 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20200619" :date "23-Oct-2020 14:15:51.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 4 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1113376 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :obset-id "2C" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2595 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 95 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 114 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "2C" :orbit-number 4 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2596.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 417.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 4 0 SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3096 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings. Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.4 s BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3096 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings. Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.4 s BOT: 16 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 806.7494 s. See COS.sp.1461560 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 808 s (404 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6715.253, 2709.448, 4005.805) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.132 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 351 s = 234 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 91% of the baseline: 736 s total, 368 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.7/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461763 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 806.7494 s. See COS.sp.1461560 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 808 s (404 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6715.253, 2709.448, 4005.805) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.132 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 351 s = 234 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 91% of the baseline: 736 s total, 368 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.7/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461763 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2243.3420 s. See COS.sp.1461561 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2244 s (561 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2435.193, 506.571, 1928.622) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.035 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 968 s = 645 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 80% of the baseline value: 1800 s total, 450 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=26.9/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461766 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1138s, 1600s, 1493s, 1600s), for a total of 5831 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 88% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=18.8/resel at 1080 A in 5831 s; see COS.sp.1461771 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1138s, 1600s, 1493s, 1600s), for a total of 5831 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 88% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=18.8/resel at 1080 A in 5831 s; see COS.sp.1461771 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1138s, 1600s, 1493s, 1600s), for a total of 5831 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 88% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=18.8/resel at 1080 A in 5831 s; see COS.sp.1461771 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1138s, 1600s, 1493s, 1600s), for a total of 5831 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 88% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=18.8/resel at 1080 A in 5831 s; see COS.sp.1461771 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1138s, 1600s, 1493s, 1600s), for a total of 5831 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 88% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=18.8/resel at 1080 A in 5831 s; see COS.sp.1461771 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown 1603476973239 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 3C; 2DFS-999; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-999 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - 2DFS-999_DSS.png and 2DFS-999_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None - but see comments vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 26 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 2 orbits vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 2 1627771640000 291.0967254863832 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "3C" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20200619" :date "23-Oct-2020 14:16:12.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 2 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 591472 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "3C" :obset-id "3C" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "3C" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 114 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "3C" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2586 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 407 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 2 0 SED PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed; includes an increase in the model flux by a factor of 3.3 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.4386 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There is one potential spoiler star at a distance of 14.5 arcsec and PA of 284 degrees; see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_DSS.png The star is 2MASS J00542899-7244321 = Gaia DR2 4685983558169395840 with G =12.65, (Bp-Rp) = 0.56, (J-H) = 0.17, (H-Ks) = 0.07. The (Bp-Rp) and (H-Ks) colors are broadly consistent with the colors of a K0 dwarf, though the the J-H color is more appropriate to an F5 dwarf; see http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/EEM_dwarf_UBVIJHK_colors_Teff.txt Despite the discrepancy, it is clear that 2MASS J00542899-7244321 is cooler and redder than 2dFS 999, and therefore very much fainter in the UV. Consequently, its proximity is unlikely to interfere with the successful acquisition of 2dFS 999 in dispersed UV light. SED PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed; includes an increase in the model flux by a factor of 3.3 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.4386 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 27 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There is one potential spoiler star at a distance of 14.5 arcsec and PA of 284 degrees; see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_DSS.png The star is 2MASS J00542899-7244321 = Gaia DR2 4685983558169395840 with G =12.65, (Bp-Rp) = 0.56, (J-H) = 0.17, (H-Ks) = 0.07. The (Bp-Rp) and (H-Ks) colors are broadly consistent with the colors of a K0 dwarf, though the the J-H color is more appropriate to an F5 dwarf; see http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/EEM_dwarf_UBVIJHK_colors_Teff.txt Despite the discrepancy, it is clear that 2MASS J00542899-7244321 is cooler and redder than 2dFS 999, and therefore very much fainter in the UV. Consequently, its proximity is unlikely to interfere with the successful acquisition of 2dFS 999 in dispersed UV light. SED PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed; includes an increase in the model flux by a factor of 3.3 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 1120.5521 s. See COS.sp.1461565 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1122 s (561 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (4964.410, 1919.029, 3045.381) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.192 cts/s at 1215.99 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 475 s = 316 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 94% of the baseline: 1060 s total, 530 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461619. BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed; includes an increase in the model flux by a factor of 3.3 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 1120.5521 s. See COS.sp.1461565. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1122 s (561 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (4964.410, 1919.029, 3045.381) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.192 cts/s at 1215.99 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 475 s = 316 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 94% of the baseline: 1060 s total, 530 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461619. BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_100000_5.17_m5.58_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.07_sed; includes an increase in the model flux by a factor of 3.3 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-999/2DFS-999_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2398.0478 s. See COS.sp.1461566. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2400 s (600 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2024.037, 496.842, 1527.195) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.024 cts/s at 1420.01 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1165 s = 776 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was increased to 120% of the baseline: 2880 s total, 720 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=32.9 /resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461621. BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown 1603476978698 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 4C; AV251;P?/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; AV251 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - AV251_DSS.png and AV251_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 22 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 4 orbits - needed to adjust exposure times and treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually - see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 4 1628171681000 294.4221729827846 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20200619" :date "23-Oct-2020 14:16:18.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 4 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1296080 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :obset-id "4C" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 95 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 114.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 48.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "4C" :orbit-number 4 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 360.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 4 0 SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 725.4344 s. See COS.sp.1461569. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 726 s (363 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (7910.370, 3347.276, 4563.094) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.143 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 298 s = 198 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was increased to 112% of the baseline: 816 s total, 418 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461775 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 725.4344 s. See COS.sp.1461569. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 726 s (363 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (7910.370, 3347.276, 4563.094) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.143 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 298 s = 198 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was increased to 112% of the baseline: 816 s total, 418 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461775 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 1610.4297 s. See COS.sp.1461573. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1612 s (403 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (3259.606, 704.424, 2555.182) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.046 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 723 s = 482 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 90% of the baseline: 1452 s total, 363 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.5/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461776 BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1312s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6139 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 93% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.3/resel at 1080 A in 6139 s; see COS.sp.1461777. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1312s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6139 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 93% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.3/resel at 1080 A in 6139 s; see COS.sp.1461777. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1312s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6139 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 93% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.3/resel at 1080 A in 6139 s; see COS.sp.1461777. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1312s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6139 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 93% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.3/resel at 1080 A in 6139 s; see COS.sp.1461777. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1312s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6139 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 93% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.3/resel at 1080 A in 6139 s; see COS.sp.1461777. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown 1629480467786 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 1C; 2DFS-2266; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-2266 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes 2DFS-2266_DSS.png and 2DFS-2266_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 20 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed -none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 5 orbits - needed to treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually- see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 5 Additional Notes (P/AF, 8/20/21) 1) AC is a copy of the first 3 orbits of Failed Visit 1C. 2) After further buffer-time optimization: - the exposure times for G130M/1291 (AC.003 and AC.004) were increased from 372 s to 378 s. - the exposure time for G130M/1096 was increased from 1146 s to 1224 s. 3) The exposure time for G130M/1096 FP-POS2 (AC.007) was increased from 2530 s to 2533 s. 1641895880000 88.47684885387332 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "AC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20210514" :date "20-Aug-2021 13:27:47.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1113408 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "AC" :obset-id "AC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "AC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2595 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 57 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "AC" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 95.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "AC" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 372 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 25 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2011.7618 s . See COS.sp.1461396. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2012 s (503 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2519.869, 530.739, 1989.131) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.036 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 936 s = 624 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 88% of the baseline: 1780 s total, 445 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.2/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461607, BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown 1644427608741 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.1. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 1C; 2DFS-2266; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-2266 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes 2DFS-2266_DSS.png and 2DFS-2266_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 20 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed -none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 5 orbits - needed to treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually- see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 5 Additional Notes (P/AF, 2/9/22) 1) Visit FC is an exact copy of failed Visit AC (HOPR-92164) , which is a copy of the first 3 orbits of the partially failed Visit 1C (HOPR-92065). 2) No adjustments were made to the planning of Visit AC. 3) Allocated COS orbits for visit FC = 3 1650186558000 190.5 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "FC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20210514" :date "09-Feb-2022 12:26:48.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1113408 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "FC" :obset-id "FC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "FC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2595 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 57 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "FC" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 95.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "FC" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 372 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 25 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 742.69 s No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 744 s (372 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (6924.780, 2744.172, 4180.607) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.147 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 340 s = 226 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2011.7618 s . See COS.sp.1461396. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2012 s (503 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2519.869, 530.739, 1989.131) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.036 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 936 s = 624 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 88% of the baseline: 1780 s total, 445 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=28.2/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461607, BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown 1650486778452 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.1. CASM was run in Phase II mode. /private/var/folders/81/nbsn78xx3tzfyhsmxnp50pk80004gh/T/OPVisit17788019281289519539.xml vstatus; 1C; 2DFS-2266; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-2266 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes 2DFS-2266_DSS.png and 2DFS-2266_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 20 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed -none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 5 orbits - needed to treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually- see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 5 Additional Notes (P/AF, 4/20/22 1) Visit KC reproduces the COS G130M/1096 exposures for FP-POS=1 and FP-POS=2 that were not obtained during Visit FC (HOPR-92204). 2) A G130M/1291 dispersed light target acquisition preceeds the exposures. 3) The total exposure time approved by the TTRB was balanced betwen the two FP-POS sub-exposures. The buffer times were adjusted to pack the orbits efficiently. 4) Allocated COS orbits for Visit KC = 2, though only ~1.75 are required to replace the exposures lost during Visit FC. Accordingly, the 2nd orbit is not filled. 3) Allocated COS orbits for visit FC = 3 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "KC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20211222" :date "20-Apr-2022 16:32:58.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 2 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 521952 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "KC" :obset-id "KC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "KC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 48 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "KC" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 1839 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 344 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 2 0 SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR = 40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3004 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.5 s BOT: 25 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_DSS.png SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_36000_3.60_m6.76_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.02_sed; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.14. ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-2266/2DFS-2266_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6332.0157 s. See COS.sp.1461394. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6332 s (1583 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2174.918, 2093.958, 80.960) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.068 cts/s at 1216.20 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1084 s = 722 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure. In particular, the integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into a fraction of the available visibility period. The resultant exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1146s, 2530s, 2530s, 2530s), for a total of 8736 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, the net exposure time is 138% of the baseline exposure time. The ETC predicts SNR=23.5 at 1080 A in 8736 s; see COS.sp.1461615. BOT: 20 safe, 0 unknown 1629480473720 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 29.2. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 2C; 2DFS-3954; P/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; 2DFS-3954 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - 2DFS-3954_DSS.png and 2DFS_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 13 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 4 orbits - needed to reduce exposure times and treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually - see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 4 Additional Notes (P/AF, 8/20/21) 1) BC is a repeat of orbits 2, 3, and 4 of of Failed Visit 2C. Some tinkering was required to insert a target acquisition into the plan. 2) The dispersed light TA was changed from G130M/1291 to G160M/1611. The exposure times for this configuration were recalcuated, and changed from 0.4s to 0.7 s (rounded to 1 s). The ETC calculation ID was updated for both ACQ exposures (BC.001 and BC.002). 3) The buffer times for FP-POS3 and 4 with G160M/1611 (exposures BC.003 and BC.004) was optimized by reducing it from 645s to 350 s. 4) To avoid having a very unbalanced distribution of exposure across the 4 FP-POS of the G130M/1096 configuration, the next exposure was re-distributed across sub-exposures and buffer times were re-optimized to yield a net exposure time of 5594 s distributed as (1399 s, 1399 s, 1398 s, 1398 s) for the 4 FP-POS. ETC calculation COS.sp.1533467 predicts predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s. 1642216260000 87.39026411030471 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "BC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20210514" :date "20-Aug-2021 13:27:53.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 3 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 904704 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "BC" :obset-id "BC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "BC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 67 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "BC" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 76 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "BC" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 401.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 3 0 SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3096 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings. Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.4 s BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.3096 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings. Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.4 s BOT: 16 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2243.3420 s. See COS.sp.1461561 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2244 s (561 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2435.193, 506.571, 1928.622) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.035 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 968 s = 645 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 80% of the baseline value: 1800 s total, 450 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=26.9/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461766 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 2243.3420 s. See COS.sp.1461561 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 2244 s (561 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2435.193, 506.571, 1928.622) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.035 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 968 s = 645 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was decreased to 80% of the baseline value: 1800 s total, 450 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=26.9/resel at 1590 A; see COS.sp.1461766 BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.20_m7.26_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.03_sed.fits; includes a reduction in the model flux by a factor of 0.9 ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/2DFS-3954/2DFS-3954_adopted_sed.fit ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6601.7100 s. See COS.sp.1461562 No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6604 s (1651 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2073.544, 1995.702, 77.842) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.065 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1137 s = 758 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integrations at POS1 and POS3 were further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. Buffer times were individually optimized for each exposure. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1399s, 1399s, 1398s, 1398s), for at total of 5594 s. Thus, 85% of the baseline exposure time is recovered. The ETC predicts SNR = 18.2 /resel at 1080 A in 5594 s; see COS.sp.1533467. BOT: 13 safe, 0 unknown 1629480478098 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.1. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 4C; AV251;P?/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; AV251 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - AV251_DSS.png and AV251_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 22 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 4 orbits - needed to adjust exposure times and treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually - see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 4 Additional Notes (P/AF, 8/20/21) 1) DC is a repeat of all 4 orbits of of Failed Visit 4C. Some tinkering was required to accommodate current constraints. 2) The exposure times for G130M/1291 (AC.003 and AC.004) were decreased to 370s, which is closer to the baseline (363 s per FP-POS). The buffer times were re-optimized. 3) The 4 FP-split exposures G160M/1611 were separated. The baseline total exposure time of 1612 s was modestly exceeded by unbalancing the individual exposure times to be (440s, 440s, 380s, 380s). The buffer times were re-optimized. 4) The exposure time for FP-POS1 of G130M/1096 (AC.006) was increased from 1312s to 1334 s to balance the exposure time across the 4 FP-POS a little better. 1642301880000 95.37990285421961 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20210514" :date "20-Aug-2021 13:27:57.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 4 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 1643984 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :obset-id "DC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 86 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :orbit-number 2 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 114.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :orbit-number 3 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 48.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "DC" :orbit-number 4 :pcs-time 392 :si-vis-utilization 2597.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 363.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 4 0 SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 725.4344 s. See COS.sp.1461569. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 726 s (363 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (7910.370, 3347.276, 4563.094) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.143 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 298 s = 198 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was increased to 112% of the baseline: 816 s total, 418 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461775 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1150 +/- 0.5 A in 725.4344 s. See COS.sp.1461569. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 726 s (363 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (7910.370, 3347.276, 4563.094) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.143 cts/s at 1216.22 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 298 s = 198 s During orbit packing, the exposure time was increased to 112% of the baseline: 816 s total, 418 s per FP-POS. The ETC estimates SNR=29.2/resel at 1150 A; see COS.sp.1461775 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 1610.4297 s. See COS.sp.1461573. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1612 s (403 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (3259.606, 704.424, 2555.182) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.046 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 723 s = 482 s For efficient orbit-packing, the 4 FP-split exposures G160M/1611 were separated to allow individualized times of (440s, 440s, 380s, 380s). The buffer times were re-optimized. This strategy recovered 102% of the baseline exposure time. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 1610.4297 s. See COS.sp.1461573. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1612 s (403 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (3259.606, 704.424, 2555.182) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.046 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 723 s = 482 s For efficient orbit-packing, the 4 FP-split exposures G160M/1611 were separated to allow individualized times of (440s, 440s, 380s, 380s). The buffer times were re-optimized. This strategy recovered 102% of the baseline exposure time. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 1610.4297 s. See COS.sp.1461573. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1612 s (403 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (3259.606, 704.424, 2555.182) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.046 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 723 s = 482 s For efficient orbit-packing, the 4 FP-split exposures G160M/1611 were separated to allow individualized times of (440s, 440s, 380s, 380s). The buffer times were re-optimized. This strategy recovered 102% of the baseline exposure time. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=30/resel is obtained at 1590 +/- 0.5 A in 1610.4297 s. See COS.sp.1461573. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 1612 s (403 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (3259.606, 704.424, 2555.182) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.046 cts/s at 1421.79 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 723 s = 482 s For efficient orbit-packing, the 4 FP-split exposures G160M/1611 were separated to allow individualized times of (440s, 440s, 380s, 380s). The buffer times were re-optimized. This strategy recovered 102% of the baseline exposure time. BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown 1644427614216 The scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.1. CASM was run in Phase II mode. vstatus; 4C; AV251;P?/COS approved for submission; P/AF 20/08/20 ; intrev: complete ; P/RS 23/10/20 vcheck; Enter targ name & Inst. & Resp. Sci.; AV251 ; COS ; AF vcheck; ETC numbers entered in APT?; Completed vcheck; Any screening violations?; None vcheck; S/N ETC calcs done & documented?; N/A vcheck; Field images checked & saved?; Yes - AV251_DSS.png and AV251_2MASS.png vcheck; Selected ACQ strategy?; Dispersed G130M/1291 vcheck; Possible ACQ or Sci spoilers?; None vcheck; Field BOT clear?; Yes - 22 safe, 0 unknown vcheck; Visual BOT check for stars not in catalog?; Completed - none vcheck; Orbit packing finalized?; 4 orbits - needed to adjust exposure times and treat G130M/1096 FP-POS subexposures individually - see notes vcheck; Buffer times optimized?; Done vcheck; Verify visit grouping correct; Not applicable vcheck; Is visit ready for int. review?; Yes Allocated COS orbits = 4 Additional Notes (P/AF, 9/2/22) 1) Visit IC is a repeat of the 4th and final orbit of partially failed Visit DC (HOPR-92163), which is a repeat of the failed visit 4C (HOPR-92067). 2) For Visit DC, the 4th orbit was planned to obtain supplemental integration time at G130M/1096 FP-POS=3 (800 s) and G130M/1096 FP-POS = 4 (1618 s). 3) To allow for G130M/1291 dispersed light TA, the exposure times were adjusted as follows: FP-POS=3 (591 s) and FP-POS=4 (1396 s). The buffer time for the first exposure was reset to 491s. 4) As a result, the 4 sub-exposures for the G130M/1096 spectrum are slightly unbalanced: (1312 s, 1600s, 1400s, 1396s). 5) The SNR of the COS/G130M spectrum at the fiducial wavelength of 1070 Angstroms is predicted to be 15.8 per resel. 6) Allocated COS orbits for Visit IC = 1 1646098553000 143.9074036708198 (Tic-Visit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "IC" :proposal-version -1 :trans-version "20210514" :date "09-Feb-2022 12:26:54.0" :trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0 :FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0) :number-of-orbits 1 :saa-model "31" :si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0 :data-volume 260992 :tdrss-contact-duration 0 :coron NIL ) (Tic-Obset :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "IC" :obset-id "IC" :pcs-mode "FGS" ) (Tic-Orbit :proposal-id 16370 :visit-id "IC" :orbit-number 1 :pcs-time 393 :si-vis-utilization 2596.0 :al-overhead-at-end 0 :internal-dur-at-end 420.0 :dark-offset NIL :dark-utilization 0 :max-dark-utilization 1920 :low-sky "N" :pcs-visibility 2989 :pcs-gap 0 ) true 1 0 SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=40 is obtained for Segments A and B combined in 0.2621 s per dwell point. No ETC Warnings Exposure time per dwell point rounded up to 0.3 s BOT: 26 safe, 0 unknown TA in light dispersed by G130M/1291 was selected for efficiency. There are no spoiler stars within 43 arcsec of the center of the PSA: see ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_DSS.png SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown SED PoWR_37000_4.00_m7.13_Z0.14_smcbar_ebmv_0.06_sed ~/box/ullyses_tech/ullyses_proposals/c28_mc/16370/AV251/AV251_adopted_sed.fits ETC estimates that SNR=20/resel is obtained at 1080 +/- 0.5 A in 6566.8118 s. See COS.sp.1461574. No ETC Warnings Baseline exposure time rounded to 6568 s (1642 s per FP-POS) Count Rate (Total, Segment A, Segment B) = (2289.268, 2214.529, 74.739) cts/s Brightest Pixel: 0.067 cts/s at 1216.21 A BUFFER-TIME = 2/3 * 1030 s = 686 s For efficient orbit packing, the 4 FP-POS positions were broken into separate exposures to allow for different integration times per exposure; and the integration at POS3 was further sub-divided into two separate exposures to achieve optimal packing. The integration time for FP-POS1 had to be drastically shortened in order to fit it into the available fraction of the visibility period. The resultant total exposure times were: (POS1, POS2, POS3, POS4) = (1334s, 1600s, 1609s, 1618s), for a total of 6151 s. Although the "unbalancing" of the sub-exposure times is not optimal, it enables 94% of the baseline exposure time to be recovered. The ETC predicts SNR=19.1/resel at 1080 A in 6151 s; COS.sp.1533473 . BOT: 22 safe, 0 unknown