Justification may be needed for use of certain lifetime positions with G160M. See "Errors and Warnings" for more details.
Justification may be needed for use of certain lifetime positions with G160M. See "Errors and Warnings" for more details.
Justification may be needed for use of certain lifetime positions with G160M. See "Errors and Warnings" for more details.
Justification may be needed for use of certain lifetime positions with G160M. See "Errors and Warnings" for more details.
Justification may be needed for use of certain lifetime positions with G160M. See "Errors and Warnings" for more details.I do not see how to resolve the warnings, after reading about them. I intend to use the the new (default) LP locations, such as LP6 for COS/G160M, with the understanding that there are modest changes in observing time per orbit and sensitivity.-880834139Assigned ID: 3472
----- Attempting Submission 1 (Fri Mar 25 19:53:22 GMT 2022) -----
HST Phase I Proposal 3472 successfully submitted.
Receipt: # 3472-1I do not see how to resolve the warnings, after reading about them. I intend to use the the new (default) LP locations, such as LP6 for COS/G160M, with the understanding that there are modest changes in observing time per orbit and sensitivity.Unsupported characters were found in Observing Description and replaced with |*|
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONSFixed the problem with the target acquisition ETC references
This marginally changed some of the exposure times by up to 10 seconds
APT has complaints about the FP-POS settings.
However, for G130M-1291 only FP-POS=3 and 4 can be used as we need both side A and B are needed.
In order to split exposures in one orbit, orbit 1 uses FP-POS=3,4 then orbit 2 goes back to 3.
For G160M four settings are used that in combination remove the detector gap.
Again two FP-POS settings per orbit, which is allowed for low S/N observations-931684619----- Attempting Submission 1 (Fri Jul 22 15:50:41 GMT 2022) -----
HST Phase II Proposal 17116 failed submission.
----- Attempting Submission 2 (Fri Jul 22 15:55:35 GMT 2022) -----
HST Phase II Proposal 17116 successfully submitted.
Receipt: # 17116-2
----- Attempting Submission 3 (Sat Sep 24 19:53:00 GMT 2022) -----See submission comments.
All unimportant issues with FP-POS orderingUnsupported characters were found in Observing Description and replaced with |*|
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
For the best data quality, it is generally required to use all four FP-POS positions when observing at a given COS cenwave. See the COS Instrument Handbook for exceptions that may apply to observations with G130M/1291 or G160M.
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONS
INEFFICIENT ORDERING OF FP-POS POSITIONSAPT complains about FP-POS settings
For G130M we need side A and B, so only can use FP-POS=3 and 4.
The first orbit has two exposures, but then for the second orbit it goes back to FP-POS=3, which APT complains about.
For G160M four settings are used in a way that removes the gap in wavelength coverage. Two settings are used per orbit
with two different FP-POS settings, not four, which is gives better S/N per exposure and is allowed because the S/N is <20418494493The Hot Multi-Temperature Gaseous Halos of Galaxies and GroupsLess than one-third of the baryons in a galaxy are in the stars and gaseous disk, with the rest being in a gaseous halo region that may extend to or beyond R_200. According to models, this is because feedback from stars heats the halo gas, shaping galaxy evolution and regulating star formation today. Most of the extended gaseous mass is near the virial temperature, ~10^6.3 K for L* galaxies, and this gas is measured by the O VII and O VIII lines in the X-rays. The other essential halo gas property is the net cooling rate, measured from the O VI line, which carries the cooling as it passes through the ~10^5.5 K range. These lines define the most important aspects of halo gas models -- a cooling flow with feedback. The X-ray lines in external galaxies will be measured with future X-ray observatories, such as Athena or Arcus, while only HST-COS can measure the O VI line. This proposed legacy program will nearly triple the redshift space for which all three lines will be observed along the same sightlines, producing about 30 absorption systems. This will provide enough statistical power to determine halo properties, including the feedback efficiency, metallicity, and departures from steady state.This program is driven by the goal of detecting all three high ionization oxygen ions, so we consider the redshift space over which one could obtain O VI as well as the X-ray lines. This places a lower redshift limit of 0.14 (the exact value depends on the settings used for the G130M on COS), and excludes the redshift range 0.170 < z < 0.186 due to the presence of the wide Galactic Ly |*| absorption feature.
For exposure times, we need to detect O VI lines with a limiting value of logN(OVI) |*| 13.2, as indicated in the model (Fig. 2); this ensures that the frequency in redshift space is greater than the projected O VII line. For the deepest X-ray observations that would likely be observed with future missions, the equivalent width of O VII is 1 m |*|A, which would have a about 14 O VII absorption systems per unit redshift of search space. That frequency of detection for O VI is exceeded when EW(O VI) <|*| 100 m |*|A or 1.2 |*| 1014 cm|*|2 (all EW are rest frame values [3]). This is easily met with our target N(OVI) value.
These O VI lines have a characteristic line width (FWHM) of 60 km s|*|1 (Doppler b |*| 30 km s|*|1)[3], so they are resolved at COS G130M or G160M resolution. From experience with such spectra, a SNR = 20 leads to a 4|*| detection for logN(OVI) = 13.2, which motivates the observing times. Our goal here is to answer the question |*|is there O VI absorption at the redshift of an O VII absorption system?|*|, rather than performing the most sensitive blind search for O VI absorption features. This makes it easier to achieve our observational goal.
The observations (Table 1) are in the far UV band (fuv; 1150-2000 |*|A), so to determine the observing time, we use the Galex fuv magnitudes (contamination from the host galaxy is insignificant at these zAGN). For one case, 1RXS J003334.6-192130, we use the Swift UVMW2 magnitude of 15.6, which agrees with the power-law extrapolation between the optical and X-ray bands for this BL Lac object. Some observations only require coverage to 1400 |*|A, so we use the G130M (Table 1); the allowed central wavelength of 1291 |*|A for the G130M will be used. All observing times were obtained with the COS ETC and fractional orbits rounded up to full orbits. We will use the default lifetime positions.
One target, 3C 279, is a well-known UV-bright AGN that was observed with the FOS (resolution of 1250)[21] but never with COS. Therefore, we propose to reobserve it with COS, which will provide more than an order of magnitude improvement in spectral resolution, and at a sensitivity level similar to other surveys. At its redshift (z = 0.5362), the O VI line could occur up to |*| = 1585 |*|A, so we propose to observe it in both the G130M and the G160M. The modest observing time needed for this observation justifies the large improvements.
The SNR of the continuum in Table 1 is given at 1250 |*|A and has a median value of 18. When making the 1+z correction, the effective continuum SNR = 22 in the O VI rest frame. The declining sensitivity (SNR) in the G130M band is compensated for by the 1+z increase in the equivalent width of the line in the observer|*|s frame. The UV figure of merit for a single object is |*|z(OVI search space)/texposure, and the objects are ordered in Table 1 by this descending
schedule is that the COS observations would be obtained in 2023, followed by analysis and publication (2024-25). Then we would carry out ground-based observations to identify the hosts of the absorption (2025-26), followed by the preparation of the initial Arcus target lists (2027). We cannot wait several years for the COS observations |*| they need to be taken soon. figure of merit. We do not request a proprietary period.
This is an excellent time to conduct these observations, as much work is needed before the soonest launch date of an X-ray absorption mission, that of Arcus in 2027-28. The
For each G130M exposure both side A and side B data are needed, and only cenwave=1291 is allowed, limiting the choice to FP-POS=3 and 4.
In each orbit for the first half FP-POS is set to 3, for the second half it is set to 4.
For G160M exposures four setting are used, which together remove the gap in wavelength coverage.
Each orbit has two FP-POS settings, which is allowed because the S/N ratio in the exposure is <10.
Splitting up exposures further to use four FP-POS settings would lower the S/N ratio in individual exposures more and make combining them more difficult.
For the first half of orbit 1, cenwave=1600, FP-POS=3 covers 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
For the second half of orbit 1, cenwave=1600, FP-POS=4 covers 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
For the first half of orbit 2, cenwave=1623, FP-POS=1 covers 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
For the second half of orbit 2, cenwave=1623, FP-POS=2 covers 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
For each individual exposure an estimated S/N is given in the notes, using an exposure time of 1000 sec (actual exposure times are similar).Joel Bregman has primary research interests in missing baryons in galaxies and the universe and observational experience in a range of wavebands, including the UV and X-ray bands. He has helped define the X-ray source sample for X-ray absorption line studies and has been involved with Athena, Lynx, and Arcus. He will lead this project and be responsible for the results.
Zhijie Qu is a graduate student at the University of Michigan (with Bregman) and has been working on the UV absorption along lines of sight through the universe and in the Milky Way. He will be the lead in the UV data reduction, in which he is very experienced.
Bart Wakker is a Research Professor at the University of Wisconsin and is expert in several areas of gaseous halo research as well as 21 cm studies. He will participate in the data reduction of the UV lines and will help assemble related data sets.
Rob Simcoe is a Professor at MIT and expert in quasar absorption lines over cosmological time. He will assist with the interpretation of the UV absorption line systems and will also contribute to observations for the identification of potential hosts of absorption.
Sean Johnson is a Fellow at Princeton University and will lead work identifying possible hosts in the fields of the X-ray brightest AGNs. He has also written extensively on UV absorption line studies, including O VI , so he will assist in the interpretation of the O VI absorption systems.
Edmund Hodges-Kluck was a Research Scientist at the University of Michigan before moving last year to GSFC and the University of Maryland. He was author and coauthor on a number of papers about the gaseous and dust content of halos and he will be helping with the data interpretation and preparation of the paper for publication.
Jiangtao Li is a Research Scientist at the University of Michigan and author or co-author of a number of papers on the hot halos of galaxies. He will participate in the data interpretation and preparation of the paper for publication.
Ben Oppenheimer is an expert in numerical simulations of Large Scale Structure, with particular interest in galaxy formation and evolution. He has written (or co-authored) several papers on the baryon content of galaxies, and in particular, in the halo, where he has included NEI and photoionization effects. He will contribute in the discussion of the results as they relate to simulations.
Randall Smith is an X-ray astronomer who has participated closely with Athena and was PI of the Midex mission Arcus, which does soft X-ray spectrometry (and will be reproposed). He is the leader of AtomDB, perhaps the leading atomic data base for astronomers, and he has code for NEI calculations. He will assist with NEI calculations and in the interpretation of the results. He has been the main representatives from NASA to ESA in support of Athena.
Alexey Vikhlinin is a leader in X-ray astronomy and Co-Chair of the Lynx study team, for which this science was identified in one of the scientific pillars. He helped with object selection and will assist with interpretation of the observations.
Kirpal Nandra is the PI of the Athena mission, for which a key observing program is absorption line spectroscopy of AGNs. He will assist in interpretations and in obtaining relevant associated observations.Intergalactic Medium and the Circumgalactic MediumGalaxies0falsefalsetruefalsefalsefalsefalseSUPPORTEDGALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000Galex fuv = 17.4GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000fuv = 17.7GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000fuv = 17.8GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000fuv = 18.5GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000Swift UVMW2=15.6GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000FOS(1500) = 4E-15GALAXYBL LACNOJ2000J2000fuv = 18.1COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG160M1611COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG160M1623COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG160M1533COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG160M1611COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG160M1533COS/FUVSpectroscopicNoNoG130M1291/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit5019208610798492836.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "01"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:17:57.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 139328
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "01"
:obset-id "01"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "01"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2807
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 57
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "01"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2808
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.4, F=5.9E-15
Count rate 36/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 449/sec
S/N ~7.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 449/sec
S/N ~7.0Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 449/sec
S/N ~7.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 449/sec
S/N ~7.0/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit2356213339382367247.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "02"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:22:17.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 209216
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "02"
:obset-id "02"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "02"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2807
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2210
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "02"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2808
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 499
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.4, F=5.9E-15
Count rate 36/secExposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 1
total count rate 171/sec
S/N ~5.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 1
total count rate 171/sec
S/N ~5.5Exposure with FP-POS=1, cenwave 1623, cover 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
first half of orbit 2
total count rate 171/sec
S/N ~5.5Exposure with FP-POS=2, cenwave 1623, cover 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
second half of orbit 2
total count rate 171/sec
S/N ~5.5/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit18166455330547581822.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "03"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:34:39.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 156736
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "03"
:obset-id "03"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "03"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2996
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 67
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3389
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "03"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2997
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3389
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.7. F=3.1E-15
Count rate 19/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 367/sec
S/N ~5.1Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 367/sec
S/N ~5.1Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 367/sec
S/N ~5.1Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 367/sec
S/N ~5.1/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit12790046223251050393.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "04"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:27:31.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 0 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 209216
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "04"
:obset-id "04"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "04"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2996
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2021
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3389
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "04"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2997
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 499
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3389
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.7, F=3.1E-15
Count rate 19/secExposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 1
total count rate 124/sec
S/N ~4.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 1
total count rate 124/sec
S/N ~4.0Exposure with FP-POS=1, cenwave 1623, cover 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
first half of orbit 2
total count rate 124/sec
S/N ~4.0Exposure with FP-POS=2, cenwave 1623, cover 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
second half of orbit 2
total count rate 124/sec
S/N ~4.0/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit17052012817748642828.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "05"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:37:26.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 139328
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "05"
:obset-id "05"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "05"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2807
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 57
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "05"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2808
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3200
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.8. F=3.3E-15
Count rate 20/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 373/sec
S/N ~5.2Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 373/sec
S/N ~5.2Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 373/sec
S/N ~5.2Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 373/sec
S/N ~5.2/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit16466054473906651138.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "06"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:40:21.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 2 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 226368
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "06"
:obset-id "06"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "06"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 3093
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 67
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "06"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 3094
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 67
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "06"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 3094
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 18.5, F=1.8E-15
Count rate 11/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 3
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 3
total count rate 329/sec
S/N ~3.9/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit6471206736814041561.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "07"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:46:02.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 313792
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "07"
:obset-id "07"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "07"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 3093
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 1924
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "07"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 3094
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 1924
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "07"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 3094
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 499
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3486
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 18.5, F=1.8E-15
Count rate 11/secExposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 1
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 1
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0Exposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 2
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 2
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0Exposure with FP-POS=1, cenwave 1623, cover 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
first half of orbit 3
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0Exposure with FP-POS=2, cenwave 1623, cover 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
second half of orbit 3
total count rate 102/sec
S/N ~3.0/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit15341548983168737929.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "08"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:52:21.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 2 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 208960
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "08"
:obset-id "08"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "08"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2763
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 57
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "08"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2764
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 67
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "08"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2764
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 15.6. F=4.9E-15
Count rate 30/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 3
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 3
total count rate 499/sec
S/N ~8.0/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit1393358953646019428.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "09"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:57:15.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 296384
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "09"
:obset-id "09"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "09"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2763
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2254
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "09"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2764
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2254
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "09"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2764
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 489
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3156
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
3xCOS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 15.6. F=4.9E-15
Count rate 30/secExposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 1
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 1
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3Exposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 2
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 2
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3Exposure with FP-POS=1, cenwave 1623, cover 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
first half of orbit 3
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3Exposure with FP-POS=2, cenwave 1623, cover 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
second half of orbit 3
total count rate 200/sec
S/N ~6.3/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit12933925988166417337.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "10"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 14:51:22.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 2
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 139328
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "10"
:obset-id "10"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "10"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2752
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 57
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3145
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "10"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2753
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3145
:pcs-gap 0
)true20NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.5, F=3.0E-15
Count rate18/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 393/sec
S/N ~5.8Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 393/sec
S/N ~5.8Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 393/sec
S/N ~5.8Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 393/sec
S/N ~5.8/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit17582145992861422334.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "11"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 14:47:38.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 1 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 278976
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "11"
:obset-id "11"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "11"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2752
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2265
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3145
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "11"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2753
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 2265
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3145
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "11"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2753
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 489
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3145
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
3xCOS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 17.5, F=3.0E-15
Count rate 18/secExposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 1
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 1
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=3, cenwave 1600, cover 1410-1580 and 1601-1770
first half of orbit 2
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, cenwave 1600, cover 1407-1576 and 1598-1764
second half of orbit 2
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=1, cenwave 1623, cover 1441-1610 and 1633-1799
first half of orbit 3
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=2, cenwave 1623, cover 1438-1608 and 1629-1795
second half of orbit 3
total count rate 139/sec
S/N ~4.5/private/var/folders/48/g57bjq397f35zfk07snrnj_r0000gn/T/OPVisit2780389366452637157.xmlThe scheduling data was generated by CASM 30.3.CASM was run in Phase II mode.(Tic-Visit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "12"
:proposal-version -1
:trans-version "20220630"
:date "24-Sep-2022 13:59:49.0"
:trans-errors '(:WARNINGS 2 :ERRORS 0 :HEALTH-AND-SAFETY 0
:FATAL-ERRORS 0 :CONTINUABLE-FATALS 0)
:number-of-orbits 3
:saa-model "31"
:si-bright-earth-limb-angle 20.0
:data-volume 208960
:tdrss-contact-duration 0
:coron NIL
)
(Tic-Obset
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "12"
:obset-id "12"
:pcs-mode "FGS"
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "12"
:orbit-number 1
:pcs-time 393
:si-vis-utilization 2725
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 57
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3142
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "12"
:orbit-number 2
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2750
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 67
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3142
:pcs-gap 0
)
(Tic-Orbit
:proposal-id 17116
:visit-id "12"
:orbit-number 3
:pcs-time 392
:si-vis-utilization 2750
:al-overhead-at-end 0
:internal-dur-at-end 379
:dark-offset NIL
:dark-utilization 0
:max-dark-utilization 1920
:low-sky "N"
:pcs-visibility 3142
:pcs-gap 0
)true30NUV acquisition exposure
COS ETC result for S/N=30; galex mag = 18.1, F=0.24E-15
Count rate 14/secExposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 1
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 1
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 2
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 2
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=3, first half of orbit 3
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5Exposure with FP-POS=4, second half of orbit 3
total count rate 347/sec
S/N ~4.5