Page 1 PROPOSAL FOR HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS ST ScI Use Only ID 5488 Report Date: 18-Jul-95:17:31 Version: ********** Check-in Date: ********** 1.Proposal Title: MEASUREMENT OF THE COSMOLOGICAL DEUTERIUM TO HYDROGEN ABUNDANCE RATIO (CYCLE 4, HIGH) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. Scientific Category 3. Proposal For 4. Proposal Type 5. Continuation ID QUASARS & AGN GO Sub Category QUASAR ABSORPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. Principal Investigator Institution Country Telephone David R. Tytler UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. Abstract We propose to directly measure the primordial Deuterium/Hydrogen (D/H) abundance ratio in one QSO absorption system by observing the Lyman Alpha line with the GHRS (G270M). The D/H ratio is in principle the best measure of the cosmological baryon to photon ratio (ETA), which leads to the baryon mass density, a critical parameter which tests the Big Bang model. Solar system and local interstellar measurements of D/H are highly uncertain (factor of 10) because of chemical fractionation, line blending and destruction of D in stars. Selected QSO absorption systems should be free of all these uncertainties, giving a direct, high precision measurement. During the past decade we have been searching for suitable systems, which must have high HI column density N(HI) and extraordinarily low velocity dispersion (b). The one absorption system which we propose to observe is the only one that we know of. It is a Lyman-Alpha forest cloud (primordial gas) with log N(HI)=17.17 +/- 5% towards Q1718+481. If primordial D/H=10(-4), the best guess, our error on D/H would be 30% (+/- 15% on ETA). If D is not detected, our 95% confidence upper limit would be 1.9x10(-5) (barely consistent with corrected local measurements). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. Est obs time (hours) pri: 4.83 par: 0 10. Num targs pri: 1 par: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11. Instruments requested: HRS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 2 I. GENERAL FORM Proposal 5488 PI: David R. Tytler Proposal Title: MEASUREMENT OF THE COSMOLOGICAL DEUTERIUM TO HYDROGEN ABUNDANCE RATIO (CYCLE 4, HIGH) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Proposers: Proposers Institution Country ESA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pi David R. Tytler UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN USA DIEGO Xiaoming Fan UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN USA DIEGO Kenneth M. Lanzetta UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN USA DIEGO Limin Lu UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON USA Blair D. Savage UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON USA Arthur M. Wolfe UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-SAN USA DIEGO Page 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. Description of proposed observations. The GHRS spectrum of the Lyman-Alpha line at absorption system zabs=0.703 towards Quasar Q1718+4807 will be carried out with G270M at 2043-2120 Angstroms. The Small Science Aperture (SSA) will be used to guarantee the resolution (FWHM=15 km/s) needed to resolve the DI and HI lines. VALIDATION ERROR We choose to use G270M at 2082A central wavelength. This is unusual, because it is below its usual minimum of 2200A, and this causes a validation error. We asked Dennis Ebbets about this validation error. He does not know why it ocurrs, but he does known that there is no problem taking data at 2082 with G270H, and that the spectrum does fall on the detector. G270M IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN G00M AT 2082A. We choose G270M rather than G200M because we believe that G270M gives about 2 times the flux. There are two reasons why be believe this: 1. Blaire Savage has GTO spectra of star U-Columbae with both G200M and G270M, both covering 1950- 2200A. These spectra show that G270M gives twice the signal at 2082A. We do not believe that this is an aperture centering problem, though this needs to be checked. 2. The pre-launch calibration of the gratings (e.g. HRS Inst Handbook Oct 1985, p.38) gave the same factor of two advantage to G270M at 2082A. However we are aware that other data contradict this result, and suggest that G200M is better. The calibrations in the current instrument handbook, are taken from the SV report. On p.6-9 of the ``Final Report of the Sci. Verification Program, 24 Feb 1992'' there are efficiency curves which give: item G200M G270M efficiency E from p.6-9 9.6e11 9.7e11 Ang/diode at 2082 0.0766 0.0966 efficicy per Angstrom 1.27e13 0.95e13 We asked Steve Hulbert (STScI 410-338-4911) about these, and he gave similar numbers (9.7e11 for G200, and 9,2e11 for G270M) on Sept 28 1993. Blaire Savage (608 262 2395), Dennis Ebbets (Ball Aerospace, Boulder 303-939-4000x5964) and Rich Robinson (GHRS, Goddard) have looked into this and find that we are correct, G270 is 2 times faster, and the SV numbers are wrong. We will report this to Steve Hulbert. A second difference between G200M and G270M is resolving power. At 2082A, G270M has a slightly lower resolution of R=20,000, compared to 24,000 with G200M. (the Sci. Verification Manual page 7-9). We MAY change to the LSA if we change to the G200M. Depends on the resolution and how well we will know the psf and wavelength scale. Our IUE spectrum of Q1718+4807 shows a flux F=1.5 x 10^(-14) ergs/s/cm^2/A at the wavelength of the Lyman-Alpha line (2070A). The sensitivity of G270M with the LSA is twice that of G200M at that wavelength, E=2x9.5x10^(11) cts/sec/diode at 2070A. Taking into account the factor of 2/3 deduction in sensitivity when the SSA is used, the signal count rate of 0.020 cts/sec/diode is two times the background of 0.01 cts/sec/diode. Thus 5.02 hours is needed to reach the desired S/N=15 per diode. All measurements will be carried out with a substep pattern of 2 samples per diode. Standard FP- SPLIT will be used in order to reduce detector window and photocathode fixed pattern noise. The total spacecraft time is estimated to be 6.88 hours using the phase I resource estimator. We will follow recommended observation procedures to use LSA with a 5x5 spiral search area (search-size=5) for initial onboard acquisition of our target. After initial acquisition, we will use ACQ/PEAKUP for both LSA and SSA respectively to more precisely center the object in the aperture. Then we take an IMAGE of the field to confirm that the telescope has centered our target properly in the dark-taking aperture before our final real exposure. Page 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. Justification of need for HST observations. HST observations are required because the redshift of the target absorption system places the Deuterium and Hydrogen Lyman lines in the UV. We must observe low redshift absorbers for the following reasons: (1) Blending is a major problem at high z. This is clearly shown in Figure 2, where we show three REAL spectra, each with the same resolution and velocity coverage (as seen from a Lyman-Alpha line in the middle of each spectrum). Note that blending remains serious at HST wavelengths around 2800A (middle panel), but is much less a problem at our chosen wavelengths (bottom panel). This marked change is partially due to the evolution of the Lyman-Alpha forest. It is also due to the number of metal lines. A metal line systems can have many lines in the UV, so the total number of lines in a spectrum scales with the integrated number of systems between us and the QSO, which is about (1+zem)^2. (2) The worst sort of blending is that with components of the very system under study. Systems at low z <= 1 are simpler, with fewer velocity components, and (or) lower Doppler parameter b values, than those at moderate to high z (Boisse etal 1992, Steidel & Sargent 1992). (3) Our goal is to measure primordial D/H much more precisely than has been deduced from local ISM data, and the most accurate and reliable D/H measurements must come from the lowest z systems, for the above two reasons. (4) We have been searching for suitable ground based targets absorption systems for three years now, with no success. We frequently find systems which look promising at the start, but when we obtain more, higher resolution data, we invariably find that they have more velocity components, and so are much less likely to yield a clean D/H measurement. We now all agree that it is unlikely that a believable result will be obtained with a 4-m telescope. The Keck should be able to measure D/H because it can (i) get much higher S/N, and (ii) do many more targets, which will be fainter because we have ruled out nearly all known QSOs with magnitude V <= 18. But we stress that the two HST targets are much better than any known Keck targets. D/H measurement is of sufficient cosmological significance that consistent measurements in many systems will ultimately be required to give a reliable, high precision value. We expect that this effort will be continued for years to come (c.f. Hubble constant, microwave background). There are many reasons why an individual system could give a misleading D/H (line blends, unobserved velocity substructure, non-gaussian velocities, stellar processing etc.). Candidates for D/H measurement are sufficiently rare, that measurements should be attempted in all apparently favorable cases. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. Description of special scheduling requirements. No request for special scheduling or real-time observations. Note that we do request an image with GHRS prior to the exposure, to confirm that the target is in the aperture. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. Description of special calibration exposures. We request a PT-LAMP exposure be obtained immediately after the science observation. This is necessary because the proposed scientific analysis requires comparison of absorption velocities between different ion species. Therefore, accurate wavelength calibration is crucial to our final result. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. Additional comments or special requests. Our observations use the G270M grating at wavelength around 2070 A (which is not generally recommended). We have direct evidence that the G270M can be used at 2000