CTE and EPER Monitoring

Internal monitoring of the decay of parallel CTE of the ACS/WFC CCDs is accomplished with the extended pixel edge response (EPER) test. EPER images have extra-large overscans in which to accumulate trapped charge during readout of the lamp-illuminated active pixels. Comparing the amount of trapped charge in the overscans to the signal level of the illuminated pixels provides an estimate of CTE per pixel. EPER images of various signal levels have been obtained since ACS was installed on HST, which provides a long baseline over which to track CTE losses. Recent analysis of parallel CTE for ACS/WFC is described here (ACS ISR 2018-09). Future work includes an analysis of serial CTE in WFC from EPER data.

WFC Parallel EPER

EPER images have extra-large overscans in which to accumulate trapped charge during readout of the lamp-illuminated active pixels. Comparing the amount of trapped charge in the overscans to the signal level of the illuminated pixels provides an estimate of CTE per pixel. EPER images of various signal levels have been obtained since ACS was installed on HST, which provides a long baseline over which to track CTE losses. 

Modeling the CTE

Parallel CTE from EPER data has a power-law dependence on signal level and a linear dependence on time. The best-fitting power-law index for the dependence on signal level is 0.5 ± 0.01. 

The rates of decrease of CTE as a function of time are given in the table below. They are measured for specific, standard signal levels obtained regularly since SM4.

Signal level (e-) Rate of Decrease of CTE per year
\(180\)

\(−4.8×10^{−5}\)

\(430\) \(−2.8×10^{−5}\)
\(1600\) \(−1.5×10^{−5}\)
\(3400\) \(−9.5×10^{−6}\)
\(7100\) \(−6.6×10^{−6}\)
\(42000\) \(−2.8×10^{−6}\)

 

The above rates of CTE decrease are determined from direct linear fits to the CTE trends, rather than a combined power-law (signal level) and linear (time) model as described in ACS ISRs 2018-09 and 2005-03. The combined model struggled to accurately fit the CTE decrease with time, likely due to CTE re-trailing in the EPER overscans.

cte_q_powerlaw_fit.png
Parallel CTE as a function of signal level (Q) in electrons. The points represent CTE measurements in a 16-column-wide bins in the EPER overscan. The points are color-coded by anneal date. Earlier data are located towards the top of the plot (higher CTE) and later data towards the middle/bottom. No difference between the WFC1 and WFC2 chips is seen. The color-matched curves are the best-fit power law models evaluated at the anneal date of the datasets.
cte_time_direct_fit.png
Parallel CTE as a function of time. The points represent CTE measurements in a 16-column-wide bins in the EPER overscan, color-coded by signal level. The black stars represent median CTE values for each anneal. No difference between the WFC1 and WFC2 chips is seen. The gray lines are the best-fit linear models for each signal level. Separate fits were performed for pre- and post-SM4 observation dates. The gray shaded band is the time period during which ACS/WFC was offline.

 

Last Updated: 08/13/2025

HST Help Desk


Please contact the HST Help Desk with any questions.