Astronomy Applications of Superconducting Transition Edge Sensor Bolometer Arrays

 

Dominic J. Benford & S. Harvey Moseley

NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 685, Greenbelt, MD 20771

 

Abstract

Studies of astrophysical emission in the far-infrared and submillimeter increasingly require large arrays of detectors containing hundreds to thousands of elements. The last five years have seen the increasing from one to ~100 bolometers on ground-based telescopes. A further jump of this magnitude, to thousands of bolometers, requires a fundamental redesign of the technology of making bolometer arrays. One method of achieving this increase is to design bolometers which can be packed into a rectangular array of near-unity filling factor while Nyquist-sampling the focal plane of the telescope at the operating wavelengths. In this case, the array becomes more nearly analogous to the arrays used in the near-infrared, which underwent a substantial growth during the last decade. A multiplexed readout is necessary for this many detectors, and has been developed using SQUIDs. In the future, a 32΄32 array of bolometers could be read out using 100 wires rather than the >2000 needed with a brute force expansion of existing arrays. Superconducting transition edge sensors are used as the detectors for these bolometer arrays. This technology is well suited to low background instruments such as SPIRE on FIRST and SAFIRE on SOFIA, and could also be used in broadband, high background instruments such as HAWC on SOFIA. For future cryogenic space-based telescopes such as CIRCE and FAIR/SAFIR, superconducting bolometers will be the technology of choice for large arrays of fast, sensitive detectors.

Keywords: bolometer, far-infrared, submillimeter, superconducting, SQUID, detector array, multiplexer, transition edge sensor

Introduction

Advances in bolometer fabrication have made possible the construction of submillimeter-wavelength cameras with several tens of detectors (e.g., CSO - SHARC (Wang et al. 1996), JCMT - SCUBA (Holland et al. 1996), IRAM 30m (Kreysa et al. 1998)). Currently, the sensitivity of these instruments is background-limited, so deep- and wide-field surveys are limited by the number of detectors and the amount of observing time available. Instruments currently in construction such as SHARC-II (384 detectors) and SCUBA-II (25,600 detectors) require a scalable detector architecture in order to leap to such a large format. Such an architecture must deal with both the fabrication of an array and the electronics used to read it out. Conventional technologies use semiconducting thermistors as the detection element, with the alternative being superconducting transition edge sensors. Another common feature of most bolometer arrays is the use of feedhorn-coupled (typically spaced by 2fl) arrays, with the alternative being a filled array (fl/2) of close-packed square bolometers. Elsewhere in these proceedings (Moseley et al. 2000), we present a suggestion for an architecture which can be readily scaled to kilopixel arrays using superconducting sensors and a multiplexed amplifier technique (Chervenak et al. 1999) to reduce the wiring overhead. In our implementation, we choose to use the close-packed geometry, which has been shown to yield an improvement in mapping speed per focal plane area (Bock et al. 1998). However, the superconducting detectors can be used regardless of array geometry, and are equally feasible for arbitrary array implementations.

Detector arrays of this type are currently being developed for use in the SAFIRE instrument for SOFIA (Shafer et al. 2000) and for a ground-based spectrometer FIBRE (Maffei et al. 1994; Pajot et al. 2000). A common figure of merit for bolometers is the Noise Equivalent Power (NEP), the power that yields a signal-to-noise ratio of unity in a 1 Hz bandwidth. For SAFIRE, performing observations of the Cii line at 158΅m (1900GHz) with a spectral resolving power of 1000, the maximum NEP for the detectors must be 10–17 W/√Hz. NEP can be converted into an equivalent noise temperature TN = NEP/(2k√Dn) (Phillips 1988). In the above case, this yields a noise temperature of around 8K. While not achievable with heterodyne spectrometers due to the quantum limit, direct detection has no such restriction.

Superconducting Bolometer Arrays

For the past two years, superconducting transition edge sensor (TES) bolometer arrays using SQUID amplifiers have been developed by a collaboration between NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and NIST/Boulder. Results have been presented elsewhere (Benford et al. 2000) and in these proceedings (Moseley et al. 2000, Chervenak et al. 2000, Nam et al. 2000). The component technologies for producing large-format arrays of close-packed, background-limited detectors have been demonstrated. For illustration, a single linear array is shown in Figure 1, while a TES transition is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 1.   Figure 2.  

Background Power and Noise of a Bolometer

For a bolometer of area A exposed to incident light from a blackbody at temperature T subtending a solid angle W, the power absorbed by the bolometer is given by:

(1)

where e, h, and a are the emissivity, optical efficiency, and bolometer absorptivity at frequency n, respectively. For a sufficiently narrowband instrument, where these parameters can be approximated as frequency-independent, the detected power is then:

(2)
  (3)

Presented below in Table 1 are some representative background powers calculated using equation 3.

Table 1. Calculated background powers for recent and future FIR bolometer imagers
(SHARC, HAWC, CIRCE, SPIRE) and spectrometers (FIBRE, SAFIRE).
Instrument AW (m2sr) eha n , Dn(GHz) T (K) Power (pW) Ref.
SHARC 10-7 0.1 850, 100 273 60 Wang 1996
SHARC II 5·10-8 0.3 850, 100 273 90 Dowell 2000
HAWC @ 60΅m 6·10-10 0.07 5200, 1200 273 70 Evans
FIBRE 5·10-8 0.1 850,0.6 273 0.2 Pajot 2000
SAFIRE 10-8 0.1 2000, 1 273 0.3 Shafer 2000
SPIRE / FIRST 2·10-8 0.01 1200, 300 80 1.5 Moseley 2000
CIRCE 100΅m 10-8 0.01 3000, 500 5 16 fW -
CIRCE 500΅m 3·10-7 0.01 600, 100 5 20 fW -

A background-limited instrument will detect noise dominated by foreground sources (nomenclature notwithstanding). For most far-infrared instruments, either the atmosphere or the telescope emission dominates the noise, which is given by (Benford, Hunter & Phillips 1998):

(4)

where hMB is the main beam efficiency of the telescope. This is the optical NEP referred to a source above the atmosphere; for the electrical NEP, the expression is:

(5)

Finally, the optical NEP can be converted into an astronomically useful quantity, the Noise Equivalent Flux Density (NEFD) through:

(6)

where Atel is the telescope primary mirror collecting area. The saturation power, NEP, and NEFD are listed in Table 2 for a variety of past, present, and proposed instruments using GSFC/NIST bolometer arrays. Some of these devices use implanted Si thermistors; for these, the saturation power is the background power under normal operating conditions.

Table 2. Some parameters of a variety of bolometer-based instruments, both past and future.
Saturation power, NEP, and NEFD are calculated using equations 3, 4 and 6.
Instrument Function Telescope Year # of Pixels / Type of Thermistor Saturation Power (pW) NEP (W/√Hz) NEFD (Jy/√Hz)
KAO Grating Spectrometer KAO 1990 48 - Si 60 1·10-15 † 30 †
SHARC I Broadband Camera CSO 1995 24 – Si 60 3·10-16 † 1 †
SPIRE Prototype Broadband Camera FIRST 1999 (2007) 16 – TES (2048 – TES) 5 5·10-17 † 0.2
FIBRE Fabry-Perot Spectrometer CSO 2000 16 – TES 1 2·10-17 5
SHARC II Broadband Camera CSO 2001 384 – Si 90 5·10-16 0.5
SPIFI Fabry-Perot Imager JCMT / ASTRO 2001 32 – TES 1 1·10-17 4 / 45
HAWC @ 60΅m Broadband Camera SOFIA 2003 384 – Si 70 7·10-16 1.3
SAFIRE Fabry-Perot Imager SOFIA 2003 96+ – TES 1 1·10-17 10
MBC Broadband Camera ACT 2003 1024 – TES ~5 ~3·10-17 0.01
SAFIRE-II Fabry-Perot Imager SOFIA 2005? 1024 – TES 0.2 5·10-18 5
MIRCam Broadband MIR Camera SOFIA 2005? 1024 – TES ~50 ~5·10-16 ~1
HALE Imaging Polarimeter SOFIA 2005? 1024 – TES 30 4·10-16 1
MIRSpec Fabry-Perot Imager SOFIA 2005? 1024 - TES ~0.2 ~2·10-17 ~10
SPHINX Broadband Camera SOFIA 2005? 1024 – TES 10 4·10-17 0.1
CIRCE @ 100΅m Imaging Surveyor CIRCE 2007? 256 – TES 0.1 4·10-18 0.7mJy*
CIRCE @ 500΅m Imaging Surveyor CIRCE 2007? 64 – TES 0.1 2·10-18 6mJy*
† Measured values
* CIRCE is confusion-limited rather than background-limited, so its NEFD is larger than the background would imply.

Saturation Power of a Superconducting Bolometer

When exposed to excessive power – either optical or electrical – the heat will drive a superconducting bolometer into its normal regime. At this point, it ceases to have any appreciable response as a detector. For this reason, it is imperative that the bolometer be designed to avoid saturation under all foreseeable conditions.

The saturation of a bolometer occurs when the combined optical and electrical power (Popt and Pelect) exceed the power conducted away thermally by the bolometer mount:

(7)

where Tc and Tsink are the transition temperature and the thermal sink temperature, respectively. The GSFC bolometer design (Moseley et al. 2000) using micromachined silicon structures yields a thermal conductance of G(T)≈2·10-10 T3 W/K for devices with Tc~450mK and Tsink~300mK. When biased suitably, the maximum saturation power is obtained with negligible electrical power and a sufficiently low sink that its temperature is unimportant: Psat=5·10-11 Tc4 W.  Figure 3 shows the region of available saturation powers for existing detector mechanical designs as a function of transition temperature.  The shaded region encompasses those detectors that can be built with current technology; above this region, the devices cannot be made with enough conductance, so will saturate.  Below this region, devices will conduct so much power as to be insensitive.  In reality, this region will likely tend to be shallower at high temperatures.  For most applications with a known saturation power, the optimum transition temperature will fall slightly to the left of the lower edge of the shaded region (e.g., Tc=440mK for SPIRE).

Figure 3

The thermal conductance also appears in the time constant of bolometers, t=C/Geff. The effectve thermal conductance is increased by a factor L of order 100 for superconducting bolometers as a result of the strong electrothermal feedback (see, e.g., Lee et al. 1998). A bolometer of fixed geometry has a heat capacity C depending only on temperature. A figure of merit for any thermodynamically-limited bolometer design can then be proposed:

(8)

which depends only on the temperature (assuming L fixed). Future space missions using cold telescopes in space will require exceptionally low NEPs in order to achieve the background limit; for a fixed bolometer geometry, this places an upper limit on the speed of a detector. The state of the art for semiconducting bolometers (Bock et al. 1998) yields an NEP√t of approximately 5·10-19 J at 100mK. The GSFC/NIST superconducting bolometers (Moseley et al. 2000; Chervenak et al. 2000) have achieved 2·10-19 J at 440mK with high heat capacity absorbers, and should easily be able to achieve <10-19 J at this temperature.

CIRCE is a 2m, cryogenically-cooled far-infrared telescope currently under development at NASA/Goddard. In order to complete its confusion-limited all-sky survey during a 6-month on-orbit-observing period, it will have to achieve an NEP√t of 10-19 J. A combination of this sensitivity and speed at reasonable temperatures can be achieved only with superconducting bolometer arrays.

Conclusion

The last five years have seen the increasing from one to ~100 bolometers in facility instruments on ground-based telescopes. In the very near future, similar sized (100-400 bolometer) arrays will appear on the airborne observatory SOFIA. The introduction of superconducting TES bolometers and low-noise, low-power SQUID amplifiers represents a fundamental redesign of the technology of making bolometer arrays. This new architecture permits large-scale (>1000 bolometer) arrays to be constructed for reasonable costs. The performance of each bolometer can be designed for background-limited noise with a tailorable saturation power. Even for future cryogenic space missions, where the background power is more than a thousand times less than for ground-based photometers, this performance can be realized for achievable transition temperatures (~100mK). Despite the extremely low saturation and noise powers achieved, the speed of a superconducting bolometer can remain very high.

References

Benford, D.J., Hunter, T.R. & Phillips, T.G. 1998, Int. J. IR MM Waves 19 (7), 931

Benford, D.J. et al. 2000, in Proc. Eleventh International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, in press

Bock, J.J., Glenn, J., Grannan, S.M., Irwin, K.D., Lange, A.E., LeDuc, H.G. & Turner, A.D. 1998, Proc. SPIE v.3357, 297

Chervenak, J.A., Irwin, K.D., Grossman, E.N., Martinis, J.M., Reintsema, C.D. & Huber, M.E. 1999, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, p.4043

Chervenak, J. et al. 2000, these proceedings

Dowell, C.D., Moseley, S.H. & Phillips, T.G. 2000, in Imaging at Radio through Submillimeter Wavelengths. J. Mangum, editor; PASP Conference Series

Holland, W.S. et al. 1996, Int J IR MM Waves, 17, p.669

Evans, R.; private communication

Kreysa, E., et al. 1998, Proc. SPIE v.3357, 319

Lee, S.-F., Gildemeister, J.M., Holmes, W., Lee, A.T. & Richards, P.L. 1998, App.Opt., 37, 16

Maffei, B. et al. 1994, Infrared Phys. Technol., 35, 2, 321.

Moseley, S.H. et al. 2000, these proceedings

Nam, S.-W. et al. 2000, these proceedings

Pajot, F. et al. 2000, in Proc. XXXVth Rencontres de Moriond, Editions Frontieres, in press

Phillips, T.G. 1988, in Millimetre and Submillimetre Astronomy, Wolstencroft & Burton, eds., p.1

Shafer, R.A. et al. 2000, in SPIE Proceedings, "Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation 2000", Munich, Germany

Wang et al. 1996, Applied Optics 35, 6629