HST image of NGC 6302, courtesy of NASA/HST (from a press release) |
Kevin VolkSpace Telescope Science Institute 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, MD 21218 USA Phone: 410-338-4409 Fax: 410-338-4211 E-mail: volk AT stsci.edu Web: www.stsci.edu/~volk |
![]() |
I am working at STScI in Baltimore as a support astronomer for the Near-Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph/Fine Guidance Sensor, which is part of the James Webb Space Telescope mission. The instrument was built by the Canadian Space Agency. As part of this effort my position at STScI is supported from Canada. The NIRISS instrument was previously the Tunable Filter Imager (TFI).
Before moving to Baltimore in the spring of 2009 I had spent 6 years at
Gemini Observatory, mostly supporting the
mid-infrared instruments Michelle and T-ReCS. Switching to support of the
NIRISS instrument, which is completely different in design and wavelength
range than the thermal infrared astronomy I was used to, was quite a big
change in duties. So now I know a lot more about HgCdTe detectors and grisms
than I did before I started here. In many ways I find calibration more
interesting than doing science.
Since late March 2014 I have been resident in Alberta, Canada, while still
working at STScI. Thanks to the internet and teleworking initiatives I am
able to carry out my work while only being physically present at STScI part
of the time. I am grateful to the people at CSA, HIA, and STScI who have
supported my relocation back to Canada from the United States while allowing
me to continue working on the project.
My main focus is calibration of NIRISS. There was much work on this in
JWST commissioning, but even that was just the minimum to get things started.
Now that JWST is operational we will be refining the basic calibration over
time. Right now my work is along the following lines:
The JWST data volume mounts up rather quickly, so I have several TBytes of
on-orbit data on disk just from the commissioning work for NIRISS.
Over the years I have gotten more interested in calibration than in the
research end of things, in part because there is far more work in the calibration
end of things than I have time to do, let alone finding time for science.
However I still try to keep an eye on work concerning the following topics: My research (in the rare cases when I find time to do such currently) is
done in cooperation with various people including:
A listing of all my bibliographic references from the
ADS
Abstract Service can be found in this
text file. The file was produced by exporting a search for "K. Volk" in
the ADS site and then removing the papers by Karen Volk, Klaus Volk,
Kathryn Volk, and Katharina Volk from the list by hand. Sometime in the last
5 years the output format from ADS has changed such that I cannot seem to
export the information in html format. This is the result of exporting in
the "ADS" format. There are currently 285 entries of which 138 are refereed
papers. Of the latter group I am first author on 22 papers if I counted them
correctly. Most of the recent publications listed are of course JWST-related
instrument papers. This listing is more a matter of curiousity for me than
being actually required for anything these days as my astronomy career is
approaching its twilight. One sees the tendency for more and more co-authors in the listed papers as
time goes on. The Rigby et al. (2022) paper has 611 authors. Granted that is
a bit of an unusual case. Still, it is rare that single author papers come
out these days as opposed to when I started in astronomy. At the request of Sun Kwok I lead a review paper about the 21 micron feature
seen in a small number of post-AGB stars and about the 30 micron feature seen
in carbon stars which was published a couple of years ago. The paper can be
found at
this link. Thanks are due to Greg Sloan and Kathleen Kraemer for their
contributions to the paper. Unfortunately a few years ago a quite different
feature was identified in supernovae spectra and also named "the 21 micron
feature", apparently the authors of the paper were not aware that the same
name was already in use. I have to admit that the "new" 21 micron feature
actually peaks very close to 21 microns whereas the one I found long ago in
the IRAS LRS data actually peaks at about 20.5 microns--as we found when we
got spectra at better wavelength resolution later. It is too late to change
the name now, though. I would give much to observe the feature using JWST
given the much superior wavelength and spatial resolution it provides, but
this type of research is not considered important by time allocation
committees these days so the chances of getting time are not good. I see that there is current concern about web content either changing
or disappearing without any notice or attempt to preserve the information.
While this may in some/many cases be a concern, when thinking about posting
content on-line I am always reminded of an old "B.C." comic strip--from June
4th 1980, I believe--which I will describe in words because the strip is no
doubt under copywrite and posting a scan of it here (I still have the original)
may or may not count as fair use.
Curly sees Peter writing on a stone tablet and asks
"What's that?"
Peter replies "I'm writing a history of our society.
Millions of years from now I don't want people wondering if we were a bunch
of illiterate slobs."
Curly looks at what has been written and observes "Well,
this should erase any doubt."
In the same vein, I suggest that posting everything on the internet is not
a always good thing...
What is a "Support Astronomer" anyway?
Useful Links
Research Interests
Research Collaborators
Publication List
Review of the 21 micron Feature and the 30 micron Feature
End Word: