To be read in conjunction with Section 8.10 of the WFPC2 Instrument Handbook, Version 4.0.
The results of the calibration programs are reported to users through the HST Data Handbook for results of general interest, and also through frequent Instrument Science Reports available from the STScI on-line information service. HST users should rely on these, rather than the Instrument Handbook, when highly accurate numbers are required.
Two monitoring programs are entirely new and deserve specific mention. The Supplemental Darks program (7621, 7712, 7713) aims at obtaining a large number of relatively short darks on a very frequent basis, with the main goal of helping users identify hot pixels in their observations. The program has been designed to place the least possible burden on the scheduling system; it is understood that these additional darks will have a low priority, and they will be scheduled whenever feasible. Under normal circumstances, this program will provide up to 21 additional 1000s darks per week, thus giving users a good chance of having a dark within half a day of their observations. The Astrometric Monitor program (7627) will monitor the relative placement of the four WFPC2 CCD in the focal plane, following indications that a shift of up to a pixel may have occurred since 1994. Although this is smaller than the quoted astrometric accuracy of the chip-to-chip transformations (0.\xfd 2), it appears worthwhile to follow closely the behavior of the camera in this area.
Special calibrations for Cycle 7 consist of only three programs. The first, Photometric Characterization (7628), continues our group's quest for the ultimate goal of 1% photometry. Observations taken in Cycles 5 and 6 allow us to understand and limit many of the photometric uncertainties in WFPC2 observations, but there is room for improvement, especially since the WFPC2 filters differ substantially from ground-based filter sets, and therefore stars with different properties must be observed to allow significant comparisons with ground-based photometry. In Cycle 6 we included a young LMC cluster, NGC 2100, and an old open cluster, M67, both with good ground-based photometry. This Cycle we plan to repeat some of the NGC 2100 observations and to add NGC 2419, a very distant globular cluster in the Milky Way, which will allow good coverage of the bright red giants, too bright and rare in nearby clusters. We will also, as usual, carry out a filter sweep on both our primary standard, GRW+70d5824, and our reference rich field in
Another program, CTE Characterization (7630), aims at a thorough exploration of the various parameters that could affect the so-called "long vs. short" anomaly, that is, the observed difference in count rates between long and short exposures. Our group has been able to quantify this effect by taking advantage of archival data and of a limited number of pointed observations. However, it is clear that a complete characterization of this anomaly, comparable to what we have recently achieved for the "CTE ramp," requires an extensive set of dedicated observations in which each of the potentially critical parameters is varied in turn.
The PSF Characterization program (7629) will continue our accumulation of data for the WFPC2 PSF library, by addressing often-used filters such as F300W, F450W, F702W which were not included in previous cycles.
An additional set of Earth flats will be taken late in Cycle 7 due to the unusual length of this Cycle. Low-level temporal variations are typically discerned in the flats on time scales of about a year. These supplemental Earth flats will allow us to continue to monitor these changes, as well as make more accurate flats for use in the latter parts of Cycle 7 and early Cycle 8.
Finally, a further calibration of the Linear Ramp Filters (LRFs) will be performed. Earlier observations have demonstrated a throughput 7% lower than expectations based on laboratory filter tracings, and showed a scatter in the photometry of 10%. These observations will allow us to determine the stability of the offset and determine whether the scatter represents variability in the filter throughput or measurement errors. Additionally, exposures of the Orion Nebula at different pointings will allow a verification of the wavelength calibration of the LRFs near major nebular lines.
We now present a summary description of each calibration program, with a statement of the purpose of the program and of how it will be carried out, plus indications of the expected products. The desired and expected accuracy of each program is also explicitly stated. Table 3 summarizes the relevant data for all programs.
An electronic version of the calibration plan is available via the World Wide Web at URL:
http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/instrument_news/WFPC2/wfpc2_bib.htmlDetails on individual proposals can be found through the HST Program Information page at URL:
http://presto.stsci.edu/public/propinfo.html
Description: The standard star GRW+70d5824 is observed before and after a decontamination using three different strategies:
1. F170W in all four chips to monitor contamination in the far UV.
2. F439W, F555W, F814W on the PC to monitor focus.
3. F160BW, F218W, F255W, F300W, F336W, F439W, F555W, F675W, F814W in a different chip each month. Some filters may be cut because of lack of time.
Observations are taken after each decontamination and before every other decontamination, resulting in 36 orbits for 24 decontamination cycles.
Accuracy: Overall discrepancies between the results of this test need to be measured to better than 2% and are expected to be less than 1% rms. This has been the case in Cycles 4 through 6. The point of the test is to measure this variation. Focus measurements have an expected accuracy of 1.5 micron, and a goal of 1 micron; the uncertainty in the focus determination is dominated by external factors, such as OTA breathing.
Products: Instrument Handbook, reports at monthly TIPS meetings, WWW (sensitivity trends); updates in UV sensitivity variation used in SYNPHOT.
Description: The decontamination itself is implemented via the DECON mode, in which the TECs are turned off and the CCD and heatpipe heaters are turned on to warm the detectors and window surfaces. Keeping WFPC2 warm for ~6 hours has been shown in previous Cycles to be sufficient to remove the contaminants and anneal many hot pixels; continuation of 6-hour decons is anticipated for Cycle 7.
The internal observations taken before and after each decontamination consist of: 4 biases (2 at each gain setting), 4 INTFLATs (2 at each gain setting), 2 K-spots (both at gain 15, one short and one long exposure, optimized for PC and WF), and finally, 5 darks (gain 7, clocks off). To minimize time-dependent effects, each set of internals will be grouped within 2 days and performed no more than 1 day before the decon and no later that 12 hours after the decon. To protect against residual images in the darks (which results in the irretrievable loss of the critical pre-decon hot pixel status), the darks will be executed as a non-interruptible sequence at least 30 minutes after any other WFPC2 activity.
Accuracy: This proposal is mainly designed to maintain the health of the instrument. Biases, darks and other internals taken with this proposal are used in generating appropriate reference files (see Proposals 7620 and 7622).
Products: Those obtained from use of darks, biases and other internals (see Proposals 7620 and 7622).
Description: Every week, five 1800s exposures are taken with the shutter closed. The length of the exposures is chosen to fit nicely within an occultation period. The weekly frequency is required because of the high formation rate of new hot pixels (several tens per CCD per day). Five darks a week are required for cosmic ray rejection, to counterbalance losses due to residual images, and to improve the noise of individual measurements. Even with these measures, some weeks no usable darks will be available because of residual images. Normally this results only in a longer-than-usual gap in the hot pixel lists, but in a decontamination week, information on pixels that became hot and then annealed would be lost irretrievably. For this reason, pre-decon darks are to be executed NON-INT and at least 30 minutes after any WFPC2 activity (see Proposal 7619). Normal darks do not need to be protected in this fashion. The Supplemental Darks program (7621, 7712, 7713) will provide additional information on hot pixels.
Accuracy: The required accuracy for darks is about 1 e-/hour (single-pixel rms) for the vast majority of science applications. The expected accuracy in a typical superdark is 0.05 e-/hour for normal pixels. The need for regular dark frames is driven by systematic effects, such as dark glow (a spatially and temporally variable component of dark signal) and hot pixels, which cause errors that may exceed these limits significantly.
Products: Weekly dark frames delivered to CDBS and monthly tables of hot pixels on the Web.
Description: This program is designed to provide up to three short (1000s) darks per day, to be used primarily for the identification of hot pixels. Shorter darks are used so that observations can fit into almost any occultation period, making automatic scheduling feasible. Supplemental darks will be taken at low priority, and only when there is no other requirement for that specific occultation period. This program is complementary with 7620, Standard Darks, whose longer individual observations are better suited to produce high-quality pipeline darks and superdarks, and are also carried out at higher priority. Note that hot pixels are often a cause of concern for relatively short science programs, since they can mimic or mask key features of the observations, and about 400 new hot pixels per CCD are formed between executions of the Standard Darks program (7620). These observations will be made available as a service to the GO community, and there is no plan to use them in our standard analysis and products. This program has become feasible starting in Cycle 7, due to the placement of a solid state recorder on-board HST.
Accuracy: N/A
Products: None
Description: The internal observations will consist of 8 biases (4 at each gain) and 4 INTFLATs (2 at each gain). The entire set should be run once per week, except for decon weeks, on a non-interference basis. This proposal is similar to the Cycle 6 Internal Monitor (6905).
Accuracy: Approximately 120 bias frames will be used for each superbias pipeline reference file, generated once a year; accuracy is required to be better than 1.5 e-/pixel, and is expected to be 0.8 e
Products: Superbiases delivered yearly to CDBS; TIPS reports on possible buildup of contaminants on the CCD windows (worms) as well as gain ratio stability, based on INTFLATs. A Technical Instrument Report will be issued if significant changes occur.
Description: This proposal contains an INTFLAT filter sweep, a VISFLAT mini-sweep, linearity tests, and monitoring images. Monitoring is carried out by taking INTFLATs with the photometric filter set after each decon. The VISFLAT mini-sweeps (before and after decon, twice during the cycle) will include the photometric filter set at gain 7, plus the linear ramp filter FR533N at both gains to test the camera linearity. The INTFLAT sweep, taken within a two-week period, includes almost all filters, some with both blades and gains (F336W, F439W, F547M, F555W, F569W, F606W, F622W, F631N, F502N, F656N, F675W, F673N, F702W, F785LP, F814W, F1042M), others with just one blade and gain (F487N, F467M, F588N, F380W, F658N, F791W, F850LP, F953N, F450W, F300W, F390N, F410M, F437N, F469N, and F160BW). The linearity test will be done at both gains and blades using F555W, and an additional set with one blade and gain with clocks on.
Accuracy: Assuming Cycle 7 results will be similar to those from previous cycles, the VISFLATs should be stable to better than 1%, both in overall level and spatial variations (after correcting for lamp degradation), and contamination effects should be < 1%. For the INTFLATs, the signal-to-noise ratio per pixel is estimated to be similar to the VISFLATs, but the spatial and wavelength variations in the illumination pattern are much larger. However, the INTFLATs will provide a baseline comparison of INTFLAT vs. VISFLAT, in the event of a complete failure of the CAL channel system. Temporal variations in the flatfields can be monitored at the 1% level. Gain ratios should be stable to better than 0.1%.
Products: TIPS report, Technical Instrument Report if any significant variations are observed.
Description: UV flat fields will be obtained with the CAL channel's ultraviolet lamp (UVFLAT) using the UV filters F122M, F170W, F160BW, F185W, and F336W. The UV flats will be used to monitor UV flat field stability and the stability of the Woods filter (F160BW) by using F170W as the control. The F336W ratio of VISFLAT (Cycle 6 proposal 6906) to UVFLAT will provide a diagnostic of the UV flat field degradation and tie the UVFLAT and VISFLAT flat field patterns together. Two supplemental dark frames must be obtained immediately after each use of the lamp, in order to check for possible after-images.
Accuracy: About 2-8% pixel-to-pixel expected (depending on filter).
Products: New UV flat fields if changes are detected.
Description: As in Cycle 6 program 6909, sets of 200 Earth-streak flats are taken to construct high quality narrow-band flat fields with the filters F160BW, F375N, F502N, F656N and F953N. Of these 200 perhaps 50 will be at a suitable exposure level for destreaking. The resulting Earth superflats map the OTA illumination pattern and will be combined with SLTV data (and calibration channel data in case of variation) for the WFPC2 filter set to generate a set of superflats capable of removing both the OTA illumination and pixel-to-pixel variations in the flat fields. The general plan of Cycles 5 and 6 is repeated.
Accuracy: The single-pixel signal-to-noise ratio expected in the flat field is 0.3%.
Products: New flat fields to CDBS if changes detected.
Description: GRW+70d5824 will be observed shortly before and after a DECON through all the UV filters in PC and WF3. Observations should be taken roughly mid-way through the cycle.
Accuracy: The UV throughput will be measured to better than 3%.
Products: TIPS, SYNPHOT update if necessary, Technical Report to document any changes if necessary.
Description: The rich field in
Accuracy: At least 0.\xfd 1 in the relative shifts, with a goal of 0.\xfd 02-0.\xfd 05.
Products: TIPS, Technical Instrument Report; update of chip positions in PDB and of geometric solution in STSDAS task metric if any changes are found.
Description: Observations of the primary photometric standard GRW+70d5824 will be compared against baseline observations. The cluster fields in
Accuracy: Photometric stability expected to be better than 2%. Photometric transformations to be defined to 2-5%, depending on filter; most of the error derives from limited knowledge of the transformations between ground-based and WFPC2 photometric systems.
Products: ISR; SYNPHOT updates if necessary.
Description: Measure PSF over full field in often-used, high-throughput filters in order to update the Tim and TinyTim models and to allow accurate empirical PSFs to be derived for PSF fitting photometry. Compared to Cycles 5 and 6, we will repeat F814W to provide a continuing baseline, and will replace the other filters with F300W, F450W, F606W and F702W, which are often used because of their high throughput but are not as well characterized as the photometric set (F336W, F439W, F555W, F675W) used in previous Cycles. These observations will also be useful in order to test PSF subtraction and dithering techniques at various locations on the CCD chips. With one orbit per photometric filter, a spatial scan is performed over a 4 x 4 grid on the CCD. The step size is 0.025 arcseconds; this gives a critically sampled PSF over most of the visible range. This program uses the same specially chosen field in
Accuracy: Provides measurement of pixel phase effect on photometry (sub-pixel QE variations exist). The chosen field will have tens of well exposed stars in each chip. Each star will be measured 16 times per filter at different pixel phase. The proposal therefore provides, in principle, a high signal-to-noise, critically sampled PSF. This will improve the quality of PSF fitting photometry for the filters used. The result will be largely limited by breathing variations in focus. It is difficult to predict the PSF accuracy that will result. If breathing is less than 5 microns peak-to-peak, the resulting PSFs should be good to about 10% in each pixel. In addition, the test gives a direct measurement of sub-pixel phase effects on photometry, which should be measured to better than 1%.
Products: PSF library (WWW).
Description: A well-studied field in the globular cluster NGC 2419 will be observed through F814W with a combination of exposure times (10, 40, 100, 300, 1000s) and preflash levels (0, 5, 10, 100, and 1000 e-). Completes Cycle 6 proposal 6937, which was shortened substantially because of SM constraints. Will also include several observations in reverse order (to test for hysteresis), in F555W and F300W (filter dependence), and after a pointing shift (to test for x, y dependence), as well as a series of equal-length exposures to test the effect of noiseless preflash. This proposal should improve substantially our understanding of CTE and of the long vs. short anomaly.
Accuracy: The reported short vs. long effect is ~0.05 mag. We want to determine it to better than 0.02 mag, with a goal of 0.01 mag.
Products: ISR, paper; if appropriate, a special task to correct the CTE effect will be generated.
Description: Analysis of Cycle 6 CTE data shows that the CTE ramp depends strongly on stellar magnitude and background, and that its amplitude varies in time for faint stars. However, most measurements have been taken so far under slightly different conditions from one another. This program will take four one-orbit measurements of the CTE at four month intervals, under the same conditions as the best data taken so far. It will provide an accurate and efficient tracer of changes in the CTE ramp, and show to what extent WFPC2 remains a photometric instrument for faint objects. Observations of the standard field in NGC 5139 will be taken at the same roll angle, but centered in each of the WF chips in turn, thus reversing the x and y positions of each star. No preflash test is included.
Accuracy: The measurements will enable tracking of the CTE ramp with an accuracy requirement of 0.02 mag, and a goal of 0.01 mag.
Products: ISR.
Description: As in previous cycles and earlier in Cycle 7, sets of 200 Earth-streak flats are taken to construct high quality narrow-band flat fields with the filters F160BW, F375N, F502N, F656N and F953N. Of these 200 perhaps 50 will be at a suitable exposure level for destreaking. The resulting Earth superflats map the OTA illumination pattern and will be combined with SLTV data (and calibration channel data in case of variation) for the WFPC2 filter set to generate a set of superflats capable of removing both the OTA illumination and pixel-to-pixel variations in the flat fields. A repeat is requested because of the length of Cycle 7 and the fact that low-level temporal variations are typically discerned on time scales of about a year.
Accuracy: Large-scale flat field variations can be tracked to about 0.3%.
Products: New flat fields will be generated and delivered.
Description: The primary spectrophotometric standard GRW+70d5824 will be observed at several locations on the three most used Linear Ramp Filters to verify its throughput as a function of wavelength. In addition, exposures of the Orion Nebula at two different pointings will be used to verify the wavelength calibration of the LRF at the wavelengths of major nebular lines. Previous executions of the LRF calibration have demonstrated a throughput consistent with the expectations based on laboratory filter tracings, with a scatter of 8% rms. The series of observations of GRW+70d5824 will: 1) measure the temporal stability of the difference between measured and predicted throughput; 2) demonstrate whether the scatter is due to measurement errors or to intrinsic variations in the filter; 3) complete the wavelength coverage (some of the observations from previous programs were lost); and 4) and provide more closely spaced points in the most often used ramp filter. The observations of the Orion Nebula, at two carefully optimized pointings, will provide a direct test of the wavelength calibration and vignetting of the LRF at the wavelengths of H
Accuracy: Measure throughput to 5%, wavelength position to about 5-10 pixels.
Products: ISR, new SYNPHOT tables.
Last updated: 06/16/98 10:38:00